To a mind (sole, soul, fluid literal device) devoted to pure emotion; is the devil (enemy) reflecting on the consequences ... thinking?

To a mind devoted to thought is the devil a fiery emotion, caring for the opposing side?

Now isn't that a devilsh caldron, an ironic tale about a thin line between space and a hard spot ... where the medium doesn't know how to work with ... only compete in an earthy (dirty?) world of lies, cheating, murder and rape of the poor mother earth which we stand upon!

Now is that a difficult enigma to lock away on odd space of the soul ... an indeterminate?

It appears to be a self-consuming enigma ... like ideal love without a thought ... whor of the battle between absolutes and abstract spaces ...

Now can a man admit to a lie? How would we expect a pure dumb love to do any better? Perhaps it needs the comlex issue of another ... an image of "self" in a self-repeating story ... changing with time. In the process of love with time would we like to halt the clock and back up? Now speak of a conflict of flows ... a disturbance that would set fire on the pool ... 'S Ain't El Moes ... spark 'n on high?

Is there another dimension beyond life? Is one admitted without knowing a wee bit? It differentiates how a singular beast enters the dimension of the indeterminate soul ... divining, filtering out the wee bits of dirt from clear space.

It is a process to keep infinite confinement from being bored. Perhaps Einstein and Shakespeare were right ... the world's just a singular stage ... next act please!

Will it exhibit pure emotion and lust, or some faint thought. Isn't that odd, or could we call the whole play ... funny enigma ... a puzzle for the wee daemons? Webster states they are the children of Gods ... a truth ... or just a spark of something from beyond (myth)? Was there something about a joining ...

Hi Fakir: Rest easy. There will soon be a change in government on both sides of the border, and Omar Khadr will be released.

Wanna bet?

A few dollars, maybe. But neither my life nor my immortal soul.

Okay, good one.  Thanks for reading my post.  I've got a bad feeling about the way things are shaping up down south with respect to Gitmo; and as I explain on my newsvine article, I believe that Stephen Harper has very strong motive to continue refusing to repatriate Omar - even in the face of a contrary ruling by the court.  I think he will appeal an unfavourable ruling, because after all, it's only our money he'll be spending.  I feel as if, in trying to persuade people that it's now or never for Omar, that I'm trying to sell Bibles inside the Kremlin.  People are so sure the upcoming federal court review decision will save Omar, or Harper will come to his senses, or Obama will just be a good guy and send Omar home.  None of that's going to happen.  If Omar comes back, he will sue Harper and Canada for the malice with which he was treated at Gitmo by Foreign Affairs officials.  The URL for the reports on the interrogations of Omar by CSIS and  Foreign Affairs is:

cid-0bcdffb6f4cf5aab.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Omar%20Khadr%20Records/CSIS%20Report%20on%20Khadr%20interrogations.pdf

and I list many other records on my sites (see post above or ask me for details).  Another Maher Arar-sized payout to a man still widely hated in Canada - and Stephen Harper won't get re-elected to town council in Dog River, Sask.  Harper has a very consistent track record of looking out first for number one.  There is nothing at all to stop him from appealing any court ruling unfavorable to his personal agenda until Omar is middle-aged.  That's the reality.  And Obama is certainly not going to risk his political career by sending Omar home without an invite by Harper.  Once Omar's trial starts on January 26, he's toast.  The only thing that would have brought him back was an unprecedented protest in the heart of Harper's home turf.  That's not going to happen.  Most of the people are spiritually asleep to the great danger of losing Omar altogether.  The Devil has won this round - may he choke on it.  Best wishes, Marnie Tunay

Isn't it odd how authority misses the importance of trust from the wee folk?

Then they ask: "How did that happen?"

Authority corrupts without small help from above and below their understanding of the holy upon where they walk. Get this: chizqiyah is an old word for "yah's strength, two powers, one on either hand" ... above and below? Ides a vert-ego thing ... vertical connections!

reply to WaterBuoy:  I agree with your perceptive and thought-provoking comments 100%; but I don't know what the word chizqiyah is in reference to.  I never heard that word before.  Can you tell me what language it is and what it means?  Thank you.

It is an ancient Hebrew word that refers to God's two hands ... two realities ... spirit and soul is my interpretation. If you do not have balance ... you are in deep do do!

Yah is the hand of God in ancient context ... Yah wah; the way of the hand ... open?

There is a lot more to it but I won't go there right now; the word can be pronounced shack for an interesting twist: small cottage below ... man sion above ... isolated bean!

All this and more in the first three verses of Isaiah in Hebrew, I have six pages of alternates from the ambiguous nature of the ancient tongue. No one call tell me word is rule without an awful maas of amour fuss nature.

Did you know that Isaiah is another ancient word for Light ... like Yesous under the influence ... walking on a dark pool? Poetry in motion ... and I think I shall never see a poem (eM; is children of God) as lovely as a tree (ET in the ancient tongue)!

Now what's an ET-hick, a wee person that stands against the moors of city hall or bigger?

God bless yah  with hehs unknown powers ...

Okay, thank you very much for your answer, Waterbuoy. Best, Marnie