Mardi Tindal's picture

Mardi Tindal

image

Let's talk about the letter: Where is the Hope after Copenhagen?

 

This morning leaders in about 250 other congregations (as far as we know now) will join me in reading my open letter to Canadians entitled ‘Where is the Hope after Copenhagen?’ 
 
Although it is written to all Canadians, I will introduce it from the pulpit, as I expect others will also, with additional context from our Christian faith. Our faith sustains and guides us in times of pain and paralysis, whether it be the seeming intractability of long term issues like climate change, or the shock of natural disaster. This week, in particular, we continue to respond with prayer and action for the people of Haiti.
 
I hope for lots of response to my letter - some may be enthusiastic; some not so. Will you please delve in and add your voice to conversation about it here?
 
My hope is that this will be a constructive and nurturing conversation through sharing thoughts, prayers and actions related to God’s healing of soul, community and creation. Creating or strengthening your congregational 'green team' may be one of your responses as you seek to integrate spiritual, communal and physical changes in your church. You'll find resources to support you on these efforts from Greening Sacred Spaces. Additional resources for further reflection can be found at the Moderator's home page.
 
What do you have to say? I'm listening.
Share this

Comments

Deborah's picture

Deborah

image

Thanks Mardi - I woke up hoping this would be here.  We will provide copies of this text for folks at Selkirk United this morning.  And I will read excerpts from it as well. It is our hope that this letter, together with information and action responses to Haiti will offer inspiration and hope to all who gather for worship in a few hours.

There will be a peace and hope candle lit for climate change and also one for hope and action in Haiti.

Cheers and hooray from across the prairies for our church, my church, to make a statement and ring the bells for change across our country.   As some of us prepare to meet with our local MP's in support of Kairos, it is incredibly important that our church be visible in many ways along the justice trail.

blessings, Deborah Vitt

Lissimore's picture

Lissimore

image

Hi Mardi.

Your bold leadership on this issue who's controversy is evidence of our sinfulness (that is, broken relationship) has been a bigger blessing to our church than anyone can realize in this moment, and certainly an inspiring gift to me.

I'm still trying to discern what my additional response will be to this challenge, but its pressing urgence requires me to act with prayer, but quickly.

May we all continue to discern faithfully and answer God's call ever more bravely!

Shalom,
Tim.

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

With the rebuilding in Haiti, there are opportunities for rebuilidng in manners which are environmentally better,  help the local economy and address water issues .

 

Some interesting articles on www.nytimes.com regarding some of these.

Lissimore's picture

Lissimore

image

At this morning's service, during the usual reflection/sermon time, I read Mardi's letter to the congregation and then offered this reflection (please forgive the lousy formatting conversion):

Jan 17, 2010.

 

I’ve spent a lot of time trying to discern what to say in this moment.  This has been one of the most difficult sermons of my life to write because there are a number of people whom I care about very, very deeply who will disagree with much of what I am about to say.  And I don’t want that care and friendship to go away.

I was privileged to be able to get a copy of Mardi Tindal’s letter early, and so have had several days to reflect on it.  And I have come to a place were I simply feel the only faithful thing to do is to comment about what she has said, and add my own thoughts.

I am passionately with our Moderator on this one.  And I know that there are some quite learned people who will not be.  But I’m here to tell you some of why I believe what I believe, about both God and the things that I believe Jesus would preach passionately about.

From news reports to online groups to gatherings in this very church I have heard:

- Quotes of “leaked emails” from a few scientists,
   - While ignoring that, still to this day there are medical professionals who publically doubt the hazards of smoking, the most recent of which was a CBC report of a doctor in Quebec who says it’s all a sham.

 

- Claims made of bandwagon mentality, writing science to get funding, and the “unpopularity of nay sayers.”
    - This while ignoring the history of the science that has led us here.  The decades spent by some of the greatest minds on earth facing up to ridicule of many of their peers and most every politician imaginable, going forward through persecution with evidence and theory that, because of its rigour and integrity and logic, eventually led to more and more peer acceptance and only painfully, painfully slowly led to more funding and some politicians beginning to believe.
    - Not unlike smoking, and the massive campaigns of ridicule and mistrust that ensued from the beginnings of the evidence being layed out.  But the integrity of the evidence and theory are prevailing.
 

- Careless and seemingly thoughtless mention that much of Europe is going through the coldest winter in a long, long time,
    - this while conveniently forgetting that the winter Olympics are in a perilous place because of our spring like weather that has my daffodils up more than six inches right now.  (Yes, it's an El Nino year.  Climate change is opperating through changes and disruptions to these cycles.) Conveniently ignoring that what is at stake is long term global average temperatures and the destructive extremism of local patterns.
 

- Claims made that perhaps what’s truly going on is that we’re averting what, in nature’s cycle, would have been the next ice age,
    - this while the poles of our planet - never before ice free during an ice age - are showing terrifying signs of warming and the destabilisation of volumes of ice that are incomprehensible when witnessed in scale rather than just numbers on a page.

It has taken decades for the integrity of the evidence and theory to be strong enough to move unprecedented numbers of scientists world wide to say with confidence that what we are doing is dead wrong.

To continue to do little, given even a quarter the statistical probability of the confidence levels of the best models out there, is simply, in my view, sinful.  It is to knowingly and deliberately put at risk the well being of not just polar bears and the poor in low lying countries, but the well being of entire generations of our grand children.

“God’s kingdom come” is what we pray.  A kingdom of shalom.  Shalom means well being.  And there is a terribly higher than enough probability that we are putting that well being into jeopardy because we are too stuck, stubborn, and selfish to change.

When Jesus returns from his wilderness period, he returns preaching the same message that John preached.  “Repent, for the kingdom of God has come near.”  Translated another way, “Turn around, back to God, for there you will find God’s kingdom.”

My friends, I believe that if we take seriously a commitment to following Jesus, then we take seriously a commitment of turning our lives around within our society of broken relationship with each other and the Earth, and take seriously a commitment to doing as we would have done to us were our grandchildren’s generation our grandparents’ instead.  I believe the life of faith leads us to take seriously our Moderator’s challenge:

    "So what am I asking you to do?
   
    Whatever it takes to follow in the footsteps of inspirational leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr.
   
    Whatever you can imagine. I wouldn’t dream of limiting you to my list. The possibilities are abundant. In our homes and offices, in our places of worship, in our families and community organizations, as individuals and acting together, let us choose hope and action over despair and paralysis."

This is not the only conclusion that people of faith, or people within this congregation have come to.  But I have the responsibility of trying to prayerfully discern the truth using all the tools I have been given, both as a scientist and theologian, and then attempting to speak boldly to the truth as I see it.  And so I have tried my best to do just that.

In the face of the possibility that this is real, people of faith cannot turn back.

May we rededicate ourselves to putting God back in the centre of our lives, as absolute best we can manage, and taking our direction from there.
 

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

Thank-you

Dan Cole's picture

Dan Cole

image

Thank you. This is leadership on a subject relevant to today...and tommorrow and for the following generations. Take action, make the changes and see how it makes us all grow in so many ways. There is an abundance of support and information on what we can do as groups and communities as well as individuals. There is an abundance of ways to make improvments in "That's just the way we do it". There is an abundance of reasons to change. This is reality, let's deal with it now. It is a blessing to have leadership like this, lets be thankful, proud and act. This may very well be the transformation that we need as a church and society. Thank you.

 

Meme Mine's picture

Meme Mine

image

Anyone, especially Christians should see that responsible enviornmentalists no longer deny our kids futures with the SAVE THE PLANET threat, post climate gate.

Anyone, including Christians still perpetuating Al Gore's and David Nutzuki's DEATH by CO2 mistake after 24 years  is not an envornmentalist or a responsible person or a Christian.

History wil curse us all for this modern day witch burning and fear mongering . Shame on all of you.

Stop scaring my kids or I"ll tell God on all you.

 

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

meme mine, are you trying to say that you deny that there is an environmental crisis ?

Meme Mine's picture

Meme Mine

image

 

Dear Pinga,

Absolutely there is NOT an environmental crisis. The climate gate data scandal proves that, unless you still believe that for 24 years this IPCC climate crisis has been conveniently hiding far away atop mountains, deep in the oceans, jungles and polar caps. Fear mongers and misguided and probably well intentioned people like you seem to wish for this misery because you and I have not suffered from your fantasy climate crisis, correct? Unless you would like to share your personal experience with rising seas and drought and floods and famine. Go ahead, tell us all about it. You are the denier, not us realists who will see Al Gore and the like charged with treason for leading us to this false enviro WMD war against a non existent enemy of climate variation.

When Christians, PR firms, politicians promising to lower the seas and make nice weather, corporate media and paid consultants in lab coats you call scientists ALL agree on anything, be suspect, not eager to believe and scare my kids. What you few global warmers are doing 24 years later and POST CLIMATE GATE is criminal and history is proving this point accurate.

Yes YOU are the denier. YOU deny almost half a century of Rachel Carson environmental crusade that defeated the smoggy 70's and brought all sorts of environmental laws, protections, standards and awareness.

So stop scaring my kids, be compassionate, be a Christian and stop scaring my kids.

Look at it this way, if you were actually going to be held responsible for what you have done, are you willing to risk history judging and punishing you? Are you willing to bet this promise of death will be sustained with the voters, the public and fellow Christians for another 24 years?

Stop this silly and now criminal and needless panic and be a responsible environmentalist who preserve, protects and respects Nature, not a finger pointing technician of blame and misery trying to save us with needless panic from a non existent enemy.

And spare me your personal definition of crisis please. The CO2 , IPCC Climate Change policy declares that MY kids will not have kids and will die an unspeakable death on a dying planet. That is why they call it CLIMATE CRISIS. And NO, not all bad weather is caused by my SUV now so please detach yourself from this Greenzi like fanaticism that will see you cursed in history for this.

Be a real Christian and be a leader who faces the future of energy and conservation and responsible environmentalism with courage, not fear.

Stop scaring my kids.

Peace,

Meme

Dan Cole's picture

Dan Cole

image

Meme mine

I agree with you that we need to face the future with courage, not fear. Fear leads to paralysis or panic. I don't sense fear anywhere in the moderators letter though. What I get from it is hope and encouragement and determination to do exactly what you are saying- work on energy consevation and be responsible for our own consumption or over consumption...but then again, if there is no environmental crisis as you start your letter with, why would we need that? Are you saying that the tars sands are not poisoning the earth? That the arctic is not melting faster than ever before? That we are taking good care of the earth? 99% of the scientist on earth agree there is a problem. The church is finally agreeing with science after all this time. Why do you think your kids are scared?

D

 

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

Are you suggesting that  I should only care about my children?  That I should not care about the shifts thatare occurring in  the far north, which are impacting their life?

 

Should I not care about the creatures of this planet?

 

Meme -- I am an average person, living in an average house..doing average stuff....so, not sure what has caused you to go into a tirade.

 

Forgoing the word crisis....do you feel there are issues in our environment (the world's that is...) ?

DKS's picture

DKS

image

I did not read the letter yesterday. We have published in our bulletin prior notes from the Moderator, but not this one. It arrived well after our press deadline. The implimentation was confusing, with multiple communications of various types. And I can not take 15 minutes of worship to read a letter from the Moderator. This whole thing was poorly executed and confusing. We can do better. 

 

BTW, with the earthquake in Haiti, creation had the last laugh...  

Meme Mine's picture

Meme Mine

image

24 years of predictions say no. Climate gate says no. Why do you insist on us killing the planet?

More eternal damnation?

Your God or Nature is not falible.

 

MikePaterson's picture

MikePaterson

image

Meme... which planet are you from? This one does face some very serious human-induced climate change threats. Changes are already being recorded, people are already suffering and time is running out. If you would rather deny this so your children aren't bothered, maybe you'd like to think about how they'll feel when the ecosystem collapses around them?

Judith's picture

Judith

image

While I applaud the efforts made here to try and persaude one person to think differnetly, namely Meme Mine, I think one look at the picture chosen to represent this person on this page says volumnes. If I were to put a caption under the picture, it would read: "I'm not listening, I'm Not listening!"

Perhaps we  that are convinced there is a problem could move on to creative ways of making change. I for one would welcome hearing some of the stuff that congregations are doing.

I did read Mardi's letter, the whole of it, to my congregation, and then we engaged in conversation. We are starting up a Green Team, and will do what we can in our small part of the rural world to make change.

Cheers and encouragement to all who choose to move beyond the neighsayers and keep on keeping on!  (Sometimes you just have to move on and not get caught in the negativiety!)

 

Blessings

 

 

Xango's picture

Xango

image

From the Moderator's letter:

 

>> If we fail to act, we are helping to doom millions of our species to abject suffering and death. That is wrong.

So what am I asking you to do?

Whatever it takes to follow in the footsteps of inspirational leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr.

------

I've been thinking about this since yesterday. I wonder if Martin Luther King would be satisfied because we stopped using plastic bags and made our churches green? These are good steps, but they won't save the planet or the millions who will suffer because of climate change.

 

Rather, I think MLK would say this "crisis of conscience" calls us to political and social action and to take the struggle beyond our own private recycling directly to those responsible for maintaining the polluting status quo. What would this mean for us?

 

1) Get rid of the Federal Conservatives as soon as possible. I don't think there is any debate that Stephen Harper and the Convservatives are the main reason Canada has become a pariah state among environmentalists. They have resisted every step for progress against the challenge of global warming. The Liberals may not be that much better.

 

2) ...and, in the tradition of Martin Luther King, civil disobience and non-violent direct action. Imagine if the United Church lead a hi-profile Greenpeace-style Gandhian campaign of boycotts, protests, and other non-violent action against polluters? This may be one of the only ways to convince the world that the ecological devastation is the most pressing moral issue of our time. If lives are truly at stake, then what are we waiting for?

Judith's picture

Judith

image

As we had conversation in church yesterday about what we could do, the conversation went to packaging.

I had this image of standing at the checkout of a store - removing all the unneccesary packing from the products I had just purchased, handing them to the store staff and asking them to return them to the suppliers, inviting them to reuse or reduce their packaging.

 

Perhaps a bit foolish - but it might produce some change if a mass of people did it all at once, perhaps on one day - like Earth Day....

 

 

 

Just dreaming out loud!

GeoFee's picture

GeoFee

image

 

A few borrowed thoughts...

 

"We have met the enemy and he is us".

 

   Pogo author, Walt Kelly, first used the quote on a poster for    Earth Day in 1970.

 

"Come gather 'round people
Wherever you roam
And admit that the waters
Around you have grown
And accept it that soon
You'll be drenched to the bone.
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start swimmin'
Or you'll sink like a stone
For the times they are a-changin'."

 

   Bob Dylan / 1963

 

"Our cities have turned into jungles
And corruption is stranglin' the land
The police force is watching the people
And the people just can't understand
We don't know how to mind our own business
'Cause the whole worlds got to be just like us
Now we are fighting a war over there
No matter who's the winner
We can't pay the cost
'Cause there's a monster on the loose
It's got our heads into a noose
And it just sits there watching."

 

   Steppenwolf / 1970

 

"And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the sign said "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls
And tenement halls
And whispered in the sound of silence."

 

   Paul Simon / 1964

 

"When they said repent, I wonder what they meant."

 

   Leonard Cohen

 

I would take great hope from one simple United Church of Canda action: stop running pleasure cruise industry ads in our national magazine; a tacit endorsement of the hedonistic ethos by which the modern world is overturning the order of the soul. I say this fully realizing my place  is not to tell others how to resist.... my place is to resist where I am; which I do by the Grace of God working in and through me.

 

 

 

 

 

Meme Mine's picture

Meme Mine

image

 

Here it is folks, 2010 and here we have a faith that is based on spreading Love and Peace and at the same time this faith tells our children to save the planet. It's as mean spirited as a civilized human can be to tell the children it's THEIR responsibility to save God's creation.For the life of me I can't understand why Christians would do this. You are Christians for God's sake, so instead of declaring God's work weak and dying from the tar sands or something, how about showing one another how to love and experience nature instead of frightening one another with this green Dooms Day threat? Why not teach them about Rachel Carson's revolution that brought us the environmental legislations, laws, protections, standards, technology and conquered the smoggy 70's? The next time you do gooders tell my kid or anyone else's child to SAVE THE PLANET, look them deep in the eyes and really question what you are doing.

On a political note, history shows over and over again that motivating by fear and fear alone is not sustainable and it's been 24 years of predictions. Public support for this CO2 mistake that history will call Modern Day Witch Burning is plummeting and I trust you all know why. I'm not the only one expressing my back lash for your fear mongering. Get ahead of the curve, and stop scaring my kids because what you are doing is going to be much more unpopular very soon.

Here is an honorable withdrawal:

Preach Nature to our kids, not how to bail a sinking boat. Teach them how to love the planet and tell them the good news that Climate Change research is going through a new phase of research and we all need to do our part to keep our world safe on this crowded planet. Teach them to rejoice in Gods' creation and to have the faith to face the future of our energy challenges with optimism and bravery.

Any takers or stay the course.

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

Meme -- why do you presume that the message was targetted to children, rather than adults.

 

I ask -- what is bothering you -- what has caused your reaction, specifically.  Did someone do something which caused your child to have nightmares or panic?  Help us to understand where you are coming from.

 

 

Meme Mine's picture

Meme Mine

image

Don't get personal.

My kids and their friends have been convinced that they won't have kids or maybe grandkids because the planet is in crisis.

Stop scaring my kids.

 

GeoFee's picture

GeoFee

image

Thoughts on Martin Luther King day.

 

If we are to bring the substantial assets of Grace into the fray we will need to examine our reliance on the manners and methods of our age. This will lead to the deconstruction of our founding document; the undoing of empirical protocols for the measurement and management of persons and resources. 

 

How many United Church dollars will nourish the economy of greed in Vancouver? How many saints will sit be-dazzled before the bright digital spectacle of mass advertising; by that choice tacitly endorsing Nike's 'swosh' - the ubiquitous sign of avarice and greed. To say nothing of the diverse corporate principalities and powers who advertise the good life but deliver atrocity;  in their ceaseless striving of power after power'.

 

Soft words will not turn the heart of our Prime Minister or the Capital Interests he serves. 

 

Where is McClung?

 

Where is Woodsworth?

 

Who draws juice from the deep roots of dissent and non-conformity?

 

"And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy."    Revelation 19: 10

 

Let us make ourselves known in spirit and in truth.

 

"Martin Luther King, In His Own Words"

 

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

Meme -- who has convinced them of that?  It seems you are indicating that it happens in churches, and I am not sure if it happened in your church, in United Church of Canada programs your children attended....

 

It is important to have specifics, or we can't address the issue.

 

 

GeoFee's picture

GeoFee

image
Meme Mine sounds just a little like the Beatles' "I me mine". 
 

 

Here is my take on the subtext of the polemic hyperbole: 'I am angered that you assault my children with your rhetoric".  Such hyperbole being a prominent device in the prophetic tradition. This last phrase not to suggest Meme Mine claims a prophetic mandate; though the divine has spoken much through shouters of the type. Consider Ezekiel:

 

'Therefore, you shepherds, hear the word of the LORD: As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, because my flock lacks a shepherd and so has been plundered and has become food for all the wild animals, and because my shepherds did not search for my flock but cared for themselves rather than for my flock, therefore, you shepherds, hear the word of the LORD: This is what the Sovereign LORD says: I am against the shepherds and will hold them accountable for my flock. I will remove them from tending the flock so that the shepherds can no longer feed themselves. I will rescue my flock from their mouths, and it will no longer be food for them."

 

I have a history of such shouting. In my youth anger moved my voice to render much insult in the hearing of polite society. Thanks be to God who now holds back the anger to permit the rise of sorrow. Sorrow conceived in East Vancouver where Church and State conspired to cast lost children away from the sanctuary of the Church and into the back lanes of the City; easy picking for the likes of Robert Picton and company. The United Church of Canada, by the officers of its courts, sided with a gentrifying neighbourhood against broken daughters and sons; citizens born of citizens treated like trash.

 

How sad is that?

 

Will you grieve with me?

 

It will not serve us well to psychologize those who come to pronounce strong sentences. Jesus says something along this line in one place: "You may deal with me as you wish, still will the word I have pronounced in your hearing bear witness in the day of accounting"; which is now standing at the threshold of our shared opportunity. Let us be measured even though we be found wanting, knowing that our refining is that key by which the way of our mission in the earth is opened. Surely we have not forgotten the insight of Wesley and the company gathered  in that name?

 

I am in this place as one invited to conversation. My understanding takes it that a diversity of voices are to be heard - it this the case?

 

Knock.  Knock.

 


 

GWC's picture

GWC

image

I too applaud our new Moderator for her eloquent and engaging leadership on this right relationship issue of climate change.  Along with the UCC's initiatives striving for a right relationship with our aboriginal brothers and sisters, we moving forward in our spiritual quest to become faithful stewards of God's creation.  This bodes well for a future of hope, peace and harmony on Planet Earth. 

These two issues are intertwined as we can and should learn much from our native peoples on caring for and respecting nature and one another.  There can be no doubt that the polar bears in Canada's arctic (which represent some two-thirds of the world's population) are like the proverbial canary in the mine.  They and their habitat are imperiled by the receding ice cover in the Arctic.  That shrinking ice cover is directly due to the rising levels of green house  gases, especially CO2.

The polar bear is akin to the sheep in the parable set out by Jesus in his days on Earth. He taught that if one sheep be lost , the shepherd must leave the flock, go find it, and bring it back to safe haven.  We all need to act in accordance with this parable rather than to continue to act like a prodigal son in his profligate ways. 

In addition, like Jesus did, we need to hold our modern day leaders to account for failing to act in the best interests of God;s creation her on Earth.  A good first step would be for each of us to write a personal letter to our political leaders in Ottawa stating very clearly our expectations that they embrace the need for significant climate change that is comprehensive, sustained, and immediate in its implementation.  Our follow up step after that should be to hold them to account at the next general election.  There realy is no more important and urgent an issue on Canada's national agenda than to get moving seriously on bringing about an enduring right relation with God's creation.

 

L. Ross's picture

L. Ross

image

I was inspired to write, because there are so many wonderful, serious people on this site who are deeply concerned about global warming.  I was also inspired by Meme Mine, who I don't think is doing much to advance his cause. 

As the recently leaked e-mails from Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia demonstrate, Anthropogenic Global Warming (APG) is not settled science, and the last decade has shown no warming trend at all. The fact of the matter is that the planet it quite old, it has had dozens of ice ages, and an equal number of ice free ages (no polar ice caps).   This is not tragic, it is just what the climate of earth does. The weather of the earth is in constant flux.  What is most interesting to me is that even though solar intensity is up about 20% in the past 4 billion years, our climate has remained remarkably constant, within a very few degrees.  Clearly, there are deep and robust systems which self-regulate the temperature of our planet very, very effectively.  

I am not a kook, I am not denying that C02 is a greenhouse gas.  Just look at Venus for proof of that.  I am saying that objective, peer reviewed science, as opposed to the science which the leaked e-mails has demonstrated to be not science at all, is far from settled in this matter, and the past decade indicates the global warming trend from the 70s to the 90s might just have been the weather. 

Let's all thank God for that.

 

Lanson Ross

DKS's picture

DKS

image

The Moderator's letter arrived yesterday via regular mail...

gecko46's picture

gecko46

image

Hi Mardi:

First of all, thank you for making your excellent letter available to all of us.  It speaks to the truth of our global problems, our need, and the necessity for action.

I'm a very positive person but as an advocate for declining species, I'm becoming very discouraged by overwhelming facts that point to the demise of so many species, and most significantly the death of our oceans and all the life therein.  In the November 2006 issue of Science, a report by an international group of scientists studying a vast amount of data gathered between 1950 and 2003 declared that if current trends of fishing and pollution continue, every fishery in the world's oceans will collapse by 2048.  Further, our oceans are now more acidic than they have been for the last 650,000 years, owing to increased greenhouse gases and the sequestration in the sea of more carbon from the atmosphere...and this is only the beginning.

How do we sustain human life on earth and in our oceans in the face of almost overwhelming ignorance, greed, inaction and often apathy.  Can a few outspoken and committed individuals actually change the world, and stop our slow progress to oblivion? I hope so - for this generation, for the innocent lives who suffer because politicians refuse to act, and for the future of a planet we love..

Blessings and peace.

Greg905's picture

Greg905

image

 

I have read your letter and say that I totally disagree with much of it.  I am surprised and somewhat taken aback by your emotional comments in the recent press acting as Moderator of the United Church. You say that the science is not enough for you. In fact the science is not all in yet and the organizations that provide the scientific conclusions of global warming are now questioned because the line between science and climate advocacy has blurred.
 
Indeed some of your comments regarding carbon dioxide are puzzling. There seems to be an attitude in some of the public, yourself included, that carbon dioxide is a poison or pollutant. Carbon dioxide is as important to life as oxygen although it forms only a minor 0.03% of the atmosphere. We exhale CO2 and without it there would be no plant life, or us, for that matter. The Earth’s climate has always changed and so to has the level of carbon dioxide (CO2), the rise and fall of sea level and the increase and decrease of the glaciers. There are a multitude of reasons why this happens but the level of CO2 is but only one factor. We look at the average temperature of the past decade and many are alarmed at the increase however it has been much warmer and colder within past human history. We live on a dynamic planet where climate has always changed, where evolution is a continual process and where extinctions are normal - and they will no doubt happen again. Periods of warming in the Earth’s history have been times of plenty with excess food production whereas periods of cooling found during the Dark Ages and the Little Ice Age (1280AD-1850AD) have brought plague, famine and war.
 
You say that ‘as CO2 levels rise, the planet will fail to provide for us and life will die’. This statement is totally alarmist and it is statements like these which bring such disrepute to the whole Global Warming debate and in fact is total rubbish. Even the IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) does not claim this. CO2 is one of many things that can influence climate and as far as GHG’s (Green House Gas) go, water vapour and methane are a much more effective GHG.  Our climate is warming but the adherents of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming also express their concern that their computer models project that the temperature should be even higher than it is using historical data. Are their models wrong even when they know what the present climate conditions are, but cannot replicate those using historical data?  Well yes they are. The IPCC bases all there predictions of future temperature on computer models. Dr Richard Peltier (U of T) is a recognized academic in climate change forecasting. Even he readily admits that computer models use a variety of scientific suppositions on past climates that are so prone to error that they cannot be reliably used to forecast our future climate (Toronto Star, Nov 1/09). This comes from one of the scientists who construct such models used by the IPCC. In effect what he is saying is that incomplete and estimated data used in forecasting is of limited use (i.e. garbage in = garbage out).  At present we cannot predict the weather much beyond about 5 days so how can we predict the climate in 20, 50 or 100 years in the future?? It is currently impossible to account for all the variables that affect climate with our present computer models and computational speed. Over time they may.
 
Another concern regarding the global warming issue, is how politicized this whole process has become. We see in the recent press (NP, Jan 27/10) that Canada’s leading climate scientist – Andrew Weaver, has resigned from the IPCC because there has been a ‘dangerous crossing’ of the line between climate advocacy and science. Leaked e-mails from a leading Climate Research Unit (CRU) indicate that there is a systematic manipulation of climate data to overstate their case for global warming. Even NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (the GISS is another one of only 4 major temperature repositories in the world) is accused of ‘cherry-picking’ the temperature stations it uses. Rather than using all the stations of the world to come up with a global average temperature, the GISS have chosen the ones to skew its projections to favour higher temperatures (NP, Jan 27/10). Surprise – this institute is overseen by James Hansen, Al Gore’s right hand scientist and global warming advocate.
 
You see Ms Tindal I am afraid you have been played. You seem sincere but while in Copenhagen you have rubbed shoulders with, and been influenced by, all sorts of political activists, anti-globalization types, anarchists and the new eco –religious zealots of the left. The Al Gore’s and David Suzuki’s of the world are the self appointed high priests – the ayatollah’s, of this new religion who preach the demise of earth and man as we know it all due to the Western World’s CO2 emissions and thereby global warming - all the while reaping the benefits of being international media stars. Canada is criticized by these zealots on the world stage because of our CO2 emissions when we only produce a paltry 2% of the worlds GHG. Even if we cut 100% of our future GHG increases, the GHG increases from China, India and the USA will far exceed our reductions. The numbers are undeniable and if we go along the road of substantially decreasing our CO2 emissions we cannot do it without agreements from the largest emitters. It seems ironic that we are criticized in our press when China and the USA each emit about 20% of the world’s GHG. It would be economic suicide to commit this country to draconian GHG emission reductions without the commitment of other country’s that are by far the largest emitters.
 
There are many instances in your letter that you write in the first person. Does ‘I’ mean Mardi Tindal, private citizen or Mardi Tindal, Moderator of the United Church? You have swallowed at face value what the global warming activists have said that we are heading for a climatic Armageddon without looking critically at both sides of the issue. Like Y2K, it makes for good press but it is far from happening. As far as the science goes that anthropologic global warming is occurring, we see possible trends but it is far from complete and computer projections of future climate conditions are simplistic, debatable and possibly manipulated. You say that the struggle to stop our increases in CO2 emissions is a social struggle similar to abolition of slavery or segregation and the gaining of women’s right to vote. To say so denigrates these great achievements. The ‘I believes’ in your letter are not influenced by, or have anything to do with, science. They are a belief, pure and simple, and not subject to science. You seem to be proposing a new religious path for the United Church. I hope not, for as a parishioner, I would want no part of this new eco-religion. The United Church would be better off putting more efforts into the country’s social ills such as poverty, disease, homelessness and personal tragedy where it can truly make a difference and leave the future climate, where it cannot make a difference, up to God.
lockr's picture

lockr

image

 

As I sat in church on Transfiguration Sunday, I was struck by a sense that I was somehow in an unfamiliar place. Has my church moved in a different direction without fully considering the implications?
 
It started with the first hymn #41 More Voices - O Beautiful Gaia. As a student of history, I recognized Gaia as a primordial deity in the Ancient Greek pantheon considered a Mother Goddess or Mother Nature. Further, in current literature, the Gaia Hypothesis purports to be an ecological hypothesis proposing that the biosphere and the physical components of the Earth are closely integrated to form a complex interacting system that maintains the climatic and biogeochemical conditions on Earth in a preferred equilibrium. Originally proposed by James Lovelock as the earth feedback hypothesis it has developed a cult following. His book is also about a search for life, and the quest for Gaia is an attempt to find the largest living creature on earth. If Gaia does exist, then we may find ourselves and all other living things to be parts and partners of a vast being who in her entirety has the power to maintain our planet as a fit and comfortable habitat for life.
 
Further, the Gaia Tradition is an approach to the spiritual path known as Wicca. Wicca, in turn, is one of the paths within the overall philosophy known as Paganism, or more properly as Neo- (or new) Paganism, to distinguish it from the original Pagan religions practiced by Native Americans, Australian Aborigines, etc. Wicca is an attempt to recapture where possible, and recreate where necessary, the Old Religion of northern Europe, practiced by the common people before the Christians moved up from Rome and the Middle East and converted the people to that new religion. Is this the path we want Mortlach United to be on?
 
A second hymn which followed the Moderator’s letter, which I will address later, was MV Hymn #135 - Called by Earth and Sky is referred in the book’s notes as “a call to live with respect in Creation, celebrating the ancient tradition of the four elements.” Was this another nod to paganism?
 
Is this all part of a new Green Religion? John 1 vs 21 says: “Keep yourselves safe from false gods”! I could be accused of stretching the analogy a bit, but just maybe Al Gore is a false prophet and our Moderator has been caught up in his Inconvenient Truth.
 
As the sermon consisted of a reading of the Moderator’s letter “Where Is the Hope after Copenhagen” I was left with the sense that we are abandoning the gospels for the left-wing platitudes of the former Vice President. Who is there to bring reason, integrity and balance to a debate that has become seriously unbalanced, irrationally alarmist and all too often depressingly intolerant. If one dares to question the science of global warming, he is labelled as a denier (like a holocaust denier).   Maybe in our church context a more appropriate moniker would be heretic.
 
The moderator’s letter is steeped in rhetoric. Witness her comment: “Our moment of opportunity came and then went, and here we are now, the fate of the civilization and of millions of the planet’s life forms hanging by the frayed thread of inactions.” She summons forth the ghost of Martin Luther King to speak for the “fierce urgency of now.” In so doing I believe she discredits King’s legacy. King was a leader, not a follower. It is clear he would weigh the science and not jump to any premature conclusions. The Moderator states in her letter: “It is my job as a faith leader to refuse the false choice between contemplation and action, between praying and doing. Action requires contemplation just as contemplation requires action. If we breathed only in or only out we would die.” Interesting, but a little too esoteric for me to fully grasp what is being said, but I do know that when we breathe out, we breathe carbon-dioxide and if I remember my grade six science, plants breathe in CO2 as part of photosynthesis.
 
In this week’s Bible study we read about “Debunking the Rapture”. In the Living the Questions study guide I found a resonance in the following statements: “The message of Revelation has been warped to sensationalise the death and destruction of masses of people, to prop up fundamentalist Christians’ own prejudices.”   It went on to say: “Regardless of their motives, they have struck fear into the hearts of innumerable innocents with elaborate constructs of imminent cosmic destructions. Their shameless schemes have ruined many lives and raked in millions worth of profit.”    It is interesting, or some could say alarming, that Al Gore’s net worth has gone from $2 million to $120 million in just eight years. It is believed that if the Cap and Trade System of decarbonization is instituted throughout the world, Mr Gore could become the World’s First Carbon Billionaire.
 
When Communism collapsed in the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact countries communists and left-wing socialists around the world were left without an ideological home. I contend that many have found a new home in the Green Movement. For them, the thought of wealth transfer from rich nations to poor nations is attractive, although altogether too Pollyanna in nature. While many Christians could embrace a wealth transfer, it is all too likely that most of the fund transfer would end up in the coffers the banking sector and the Al Gores. 
 
Nigel Lawson, founder of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), on 14 Feb 10 in refuting the allegation that Exxon Mobil’s cash is supporting a concerted campaign to undermine the case for man-made warming said: “This slightly curious formulation was presumably shorthand for referring to the case for rapid and drastic decarbonisation in order to prevent man-made warming; and what badly needs to be discussed and debated, far more than it has hitherto in the mainstream media, is the strength and weakness of that case, rather than who is providing the finance.” This is a highly complex issue, involving science, technology, economics and ethics.
 
The UN - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has relied on World Wildlife Fund studies regarding the "transformation of natural coastal areas," the "destruction of more mangroves," "glacial lake outbursts causing mudflows and avalanches," changes in the ecosystem of the "Mesoamerican reef," and so on. The Wildlife Fund is a green lobby that believes in global warming, and its "research" reflects its advocacy, not the scientific method.
All of this matters because the IPCC has been advertised as the last and definitive word on climate science. Its reports are the basis on which Al Gore, President Obama and others have claimed that climate ruin is inevitable unless the world reorganizes its economies with huge new taxes on carbon. Now we are discovering the U.N. reports are sloppy political documents intended to drive the climate lobby's regulatory agenda.
The lesson of “climategate” and now the IPCC's shoddy sourcing is that the claims of the global warming lobby need a far more rigorous scrutiny.
 
So, without the hype, what is science telling us? I have attached as Annex A 10 myths addressed on the website Friends of Science Website.
 
Which side should we believe? It is my belief that neither should be taken as gospel. Both like to indulge in exaggeration and demonization. The climate debate is usually portrayed as a fight between two extremes - between people who think it’s all a hoax and people who think catastrophe is imminent if we do nothing. Truthfully, there is a whole lot we just don’t know. Unfortunately, our Moderator has bought into one side -  hook, line and sinker.
 
I will end with the words of Albert Einstein, who said: “The important thing is not to stop questioning.”
 
 
Annex A
 
MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate.
FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. The ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects"). Two science teams have shown that correcting the surface temperature record for the effects of urban development would reduce the warming trend over land from 1980 by half.
There has been no catastrophic warming recorded.

MYTH 2: The "hockey stick" graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature decrease for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase.

FACT: Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare.
The "hockey stick", a poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and has now also been proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that.
 
MYTH 3: Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth.
FACT: Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.
 
MYTH 4: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.
FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.039% of the atmosphere. While the minor gases are more effective as "greenhouse agents" than water vapour and clouds, the latter are overwhelming the effect by their sheer volume and – in the end – are thought to be responsible for 75% of the "Greenhouse effect". At current concentrations, a 3% change of water vapour in the atmosphere would have the same effect as a 100% change in CO2.
Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention these important facts.
MYTH 5: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming.
FACT: The computer models assume that CO2 is the primary climate driver, and that the Sun has an insignificant effect on climate. You cannot use the output of a model to verify or prove its initial assumption - that is circular reasoning and is illogical. Computer models can be made to roughly match the 20th century temperature rise by adjusting many input parameters and using strong positive feedbacks. They do not "prove" anything. Also, computer models predicting global warming are incapable of properly including the effects of the sun, cosmic rays and the clouds. The sun is a major cause of temperature variation on the earth surface as its received radiation changes all the time. This happens largely in cyclical fashion. The number and the lengths in time of sunspots can be correlated very closely with average temperatures on earth, e.g. the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period. Varying intensity of solar heat radiation affects the surface temperature of the oceans and the currents. Warmer ocean water expels gases, some of which are CO2. Solar radiation interferes with the cosmic ray flux, thus influencing the amount ionized nuclei which control cloud cover.

MYTH 6: The UN proved that man–made CO2 causes global warming.
FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from the final draft. Here they are:
1)    “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.”
2)    “No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes”
To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming.
MYTH 7: CO2 is a pollutant.
FACT: This is absolutely not true. Nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere. We could not live in 100% nitrogen either. Carbon dioxide is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is. CO2 is essential to life on earth. It is necessary for plant growth since increased CO2 intake as a result of increased atmospheric concentration causes many trees and other plants to grow more vigorously. Unfortunately, the Canadian Government has included CO2 with a number of truly toxic and noxious substances listed by the Environmental Protection Act, only as their means to politically control it.
MYTH 8: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes.
FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on a global scale. Regional variations may occur. Growing insurance and infrastructure repair costs, particularly in coastal areas, are sometimes claimed to be the result of increasing frequency and severity of storms, whereas in reality they are a function of increasing population density, escalating development value, and ever more media reporting.

MYTH 9: Receding glaciers and the calving of ice shelves are proof of global warming.
FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glacier melting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelves have been breaking off for centuries. Scientists know of at least 33 periods of glaciers growing and then retreating. It’s normal. Besides, glacier's health is dependent as much on precipitation as on temperature.
 MYTH 10: The earth’s poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking up and melting and the sea level rising.
FACT: The earth is variable. The western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer, due to cyclic events in the Pacific Ocean, but the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder. The small Palmer Peninsula of Antarctica is getting warmer, while the main Antarctic continent is actually cooling. Ice thicknesses are increasing both on Greenland and in Antarctica.
Sea level monitoring in the Pacific (Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has shown no sign of any sea level rise.
cafe