Is the only virgin entity we have to begin with ... imaginary space of the mind to be filled ... just a simple symbol of a KISS priciple in space of dark Ness, when the Roman Principle demanded death and burning for those not following their way? Once institutionalized, an idea stays until disaster creates change ... A'm'n hates change without space for manouvering ... moe-vein!

The OX seems an appropriate chilling symbol for John Bunyan's ontology ... blown (bleu) theory of the means to an end, without reverence for the surrounding infinite support system. It is a rare burr'd, burro'd into my mind of a light in space of wilderness. Can we draw from IT ... as a th' aught? It is a force in fine th' ought, phors a' phine point of thy's word. (first one has to note the evolution of word symbols from 'ph' to 'ef' in a holding letter like phaer in the imagination. Phaer is a light in the darkness, if you care enough to make something of nothing, a bare, pure Love is dangerous alone ... requires balances ... thus pers-ephone and the realm of the fisherman ... like digging in empty space ... intuit'dite ion! Such is an integral byte.

One must pay attention to the meanings of the symbols of myth ... making murth in a tree. Love is in everything and everything is in God ... as such IT will all collapse as light disperses in our fear of collecting, observing the process, like blind things, ignorant of intellect ... Children of God ... without a th' ought! Is that an altered personality? It seems to a' moes the satyrs (hyads)!

Is this the expression of the mob going to meet the ultimate without light? "An no man meets the father without ..."

Is kno-ledge savation in the shiyr (cry) from the dark?

An offering of a ςow, or a sous of Light ...

(If the O and the X are superimposed an old symbol of  daedalist come through ... it didn't in the poem; Rae search 's required!)