As I was reading Fakirs Canada's blog and the ensuing thread, I kept remembering my own experience. As a very young child in an evangelical fundamental dispensational church in southern California, down in the land of Tim Lahay and Hal Lindsey and at a time when they were just bursting on to the scene, I soaked in the Sunday School facts I was fed weekly, that Jesus was God's son, an equal part of the Triune deity called the godhead. I assumed they were right, after all they were the grown ups, right?
I was taught the doctrine of the incarnaton from birth. Jesus was God come in the flesh. I believed it. Time went on and in 1965 around Easter time we were told that God was dead. The national press announced this, and all the magazines like Time did too. We did not have television right then and we did not subscribe to Time or anything else of a news nature. God was a topic off limits in the public school system, so I just had to guess how it was they know that God had died. My God had not died; I was still praying to God with the same frequency as before and there was no mention that God had died in the church I was attending.
So I went on believing that Jesus was God and that God was alive and well up in heaven. Then one day I was trying to explain the way of salvation in some youth group--we had to practice this and go out and witness from door to door from time to time. Anyway, in my explanation I said that God died on the cross for us and WOW I was told I was teaching heresy. This was and is still very difficult for me to understand. If Jesus is supposed to be God, why can I not say that God died when Jesus died? Aparently this is a well-argued-about heresy that is very old, centuries old in fact.
Anyway, I reasoned that if Jesus could not be said to be God to the extent that they were one and the same person, then there was something wrong with insisting that God and Jesus and the Hoy Spirit were equal in this Triune Godhead. Then as I had read the book from cover to cover several times myself (you won't believe this, but reading the Bible was one of the things my cousins and I did for entertainment--we would have one person read while the rest of us pulled weeds out of my uncle's dishondra lawn experiment...) anyway, I did not see Trinity or Rapture any where in there.
I was about 12-14 when I decided that there was a difference between the Jesus I met at church and the Jesus I met in the Bible. The one in the Bible was not always consistent because the book of John was quite different from the other three gospels, but the Jesus in those other gospels was pretty consistent at being more concerned with the welfare of the persons around him than in arguing who he was or anything lke that.
As time passed and I married into families just like my own, I did not have a place to discuss my questions. Then in 1995 a really funny thing happened which I will no doubt write about sometime but to save time here I will just say that I had a chance drop out of no where to go back to school and after some fast talking and help from others, I got to go to a school other than a Bible Institute. I got to go to a school founded by a faith other than my own. And that was where I finally got to try out my arguments with people who could hear me. After a few months of this freedom of information experience, I felt all the things I had ever learned as "fact" were nothing other than either lies or at best mistakes.
After completeing a BA and then going on to a United Church theological college, I have come out with my own distinct belief system which includes a healthy dose of "I don't know." I think the very biggest thing for me is getting used to the idea that the Bible did not fall out of heaven or be extruded from some 40 mens' hands exactly regurgitating what God said to them. Actually the Bible is our book, our botched attempts to get down on paper the documents our ancestors decided were worth keeping and eventually this group of documents was capped at the present limit and said to be the foundational document of our faith. That shift from the Bible being the direct word of God to the Bible being the direct word of people has made all the difference for me.
I still respect the book, but I also know the book does not work like I thought it did in my childhood. And with that I will say it is now time to make supper. No doubt I will get back to blogging in the not too distant future.
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
Arminius
Posted on: 12/13/2008 00:14
Hi evensong:
Was Jesus God?
Yes, I think he he was, but no more so than you or I or anyone else. He was, however, more aware of his divinity than most of us, and brought us the message of our divinity. Unfortunately, we misunderstood his message, divinized only the messenger, and left ourselves in the mud. It is high time to pull ourselves out of the mire!
WaterBuoy
Posted on: 12/13/2008 10:42
When physical people killed the light (awareness of Love), Christ, does not that emotion rest it's case on mankind to dig it up from within? It is a very metaphysical process to me ... something that we have to think of in depth, but difficult to do in a world where the infinite nature of soul (shadow of mankind) is denied. Now where in hell do we find an enlighted soul down here under the heavens?
Is that material for satire on man ( non sexual metaphysical creature of the night, comes in Paris, Perez, or pairs) if it wouldn't make thoughtful socialism a sin. Now the pseudonym from a dumb creature like I, that probes ... would that be satyr, hammadryad, aphorism, or just simple acronym? The Book of John describes the common (John, Jean, Jack, Jane, whatever) word as a strange thing, but if we study it in depth does it come alive like the mind, a shadowy formless void to be fullfilled?
Then psychologist equate the mind and story reversably like Janus, the God of the threshold in Roman tradition that was like a duality. They said it faced away from life at both ends. I wonder if it is just unity; one door and passage in both directions with light or love and each time you transit, you return somewhere totally changed! Now I'm just a nobody here below so take this all with a giggle, but in there seems to be a small spark of truth. If we could just put it all together ... would that drop the whole cosmos into a vast dark hole ... aphorism for a much bigger mind? Have you ever heard of the Gods (integrated, singular) collapsing into a hole of laughter around the corner with the enemy ... a twisted mind of thought? Ides something to unravel!
Did you know that scientists puzzle over the bending of light, space and time as equivalent items in Einstein's realm ... then they still do not contend with the quantum nature of a loving mind ... it just pops up unexpectedly ... whatever the metaphor? They just do not accept indeterminate things ... or more properly ... non-things ... anti matter!
Dan Brown addressed the subject in Angels and Demons to the distriss of the theologically perfect ( a human construct that needs to be deconstructed and analysed under Jacques Derrida's direction of philosophical literature) ... cosmological oddity like Caligula a self-centred God fallen from space ... collapse of Eden? Physical God ... go way wit' Yah! It's in the psalm/palm ... whatever, not fixed or institutionalized like jack Nickolson's devilish portrayals of the sane and the sadistic! What's norm in a universe that wobbles?
RevLGKing
Posted on: 12/13/2008 14:37
"... Yes, I think he was, but no more so than you or I or anyone else. He was, however, more aware of his divinity than most of us, and brought us the message of our divinity. Unfortunately, we misunderstood his message, divinized only the messenger, and left ourselves in the mud. It is high time to pull ourselves out of the mire!"
Well said, Arminius!
BTW, while I am not into the game of proof-texting just to win an argument, I do believe in looking at texts which have impressed me. For example, in John 10: 34, Jesus, himself, quotes Psalm 82, with approval: Jesus answered, "It is written in your own Law that God said, 'You are gods.' "
The rest of what he say implies: "And so is anyone a god-like being, who makes the choice to think, speak and act in god-like--that is, love-like--ways.
I am also impressed by John 17: 20-26, from which we get, "That all may be one" found on our crest. BTW, this text is about our personal oneness with GOD, not about having one "True" and organized religion, or mega church.
Frequently, over the years, I have preached on these texts.
bygraceiam
Posted on: 12/13/2008 20:46
Hello evensongs......God bless you....
I have always believe in the Trinity....I look back to the scriptures to Gen...1:26...
And God said " Let Us" make man in our image....who was this us if it wasnt the other parts of the Divine....for God is all Spirit ...the Spirit of the Lord hovered over the waters.....
Gen 2:4.....
the " Day the Lord God " made the earth and the heavens..
This is the first time the two were together as God , Lord and of course both Spirit..
And of course the Christ Jesus and the Kingdom of Heaven are within us...
This is what I believe.....Praise the Lord...
RevLGKing.....have you checked you wondermail
IJL:bg
Arminius
Posted on: 12/13/2008 23:57
Hi RevKing: Thanks for the scriptural references. I shall commit them to memory, or, better yet, to my notebook. My memory isn't as good as it used to be.
RevLGKing
Posted on: 12/14/2008 02:05
Arminius, IMO, Jesus was an inclusive non-sectarian universalist. Keep in mind, the famous John 3:16 begins: "God so loved the world..." not just Judah and Israel.
Also note that, in his first sermon, mentioned in Luke 4:25-27, Jesus made the point of telling his fellows Jews, in his home-town synagogue in Nazareth, that in the day of Elijah and Elisha God worked through and for people who were not necessarily Jews. Zaraphath, in the territory of Sidon--in which the widow lived--was a Gentile area--modern Lebanon. Elisha healed Naaman the Syrian. Notice how angry the bigots in the synagogue got when he pointed out the importance of being inclusive.
In Luke 10, the parable of the Good Samaritan is about a Gentile--despised by many of his fellow Jews.
RevLGKing
Posted on: 12/14/2008 10:55
"RevLGKing.....have you checked you wondermail?" Yes I have, graceiam. And I look forward to dialoguing with you about the important points you raise, perhaps in a special blog for that purpose.
BigDave
Posted on: 12/14/2008 11:04
Evensong; Your blog excites me. I think you are experiencing the movement of the Spirit for yourself and not just reading about it. You are 'on a journey' and not just studying other folks journeys from thousands of years ago. Having a good dose of doubt is good too. As Linnea Good sings, "It takes a lot of doubt for a faith to grow."
Good for you. Keep us posted.
Peace
Dave
RevLGKing
Posted on: 12/15/2008 17:02
More about the inclusive nature of Jesus' message:
Take note: Luke 3 tells us about the work of Jesus' cousin, John the Baptist.
About twenty years after the story of Jesus and his questioning of the authorities in the Temple, John introduced Jesus as the Messiah, or, as we say, Christ.
Now, jump forward about two decades.
In Luke 4:1-13 we read about the temptation of Jesus as he is about to begin his short ministry.
IMO, Jesus was tempted as follows:
1. to be either a left-wing dictator--that is, one with the power to "turn stones into bread"--a good socialist...
2. or, a right-wing dictator--that is, one with the power over all people and all wealth--a good capitalist.
3. In addition, he was tempted to cap all this all off with his claiming to have god-like authority.
IMO, he rejected all the above temptations.
================================
With the above temptations in mind let us look at: Luke 4:16-21 (New Living Translation) we read:
16 When he came to the village of Nazareth, his boyhood home, he went as usual to the synagogue on the Sabbath and stood up to read the Scriptures.
17 The scroll of Isaiah the prophet was handed to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where this was written:
18 “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
for he has anointed me to bring Good News to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim that captives will be released,
that the blind will see,
that the oppressed will be set free,
19 and that the time of the Lord’s favor has come.”
20 He rolled up the scroll, handed it back to the attendant, and sat down. All eyes in the synagogue looked at him intently.
21 Then he began to speak to them. “The Scripture you’ve just heard has been fulfilled this very day!” Notice where he stops. It is right in the middle of the verse, 2a, in Isaiah.
[Immediately, he got their attention.]
ISAIAH 61:2b
But here is what Jesus did not quote: "...and with it, the day of God’s anger against their enemies.
[The KJV&RSV use, "...the day of vengeance of our God." Can you imagine that, who taught his disciples to love Gentiles, even ones who are enemies, approved of a god of vengeance?]
3 To all who mourn in Israel, [The KJV&RSV use, Zion.]
he will give a crown of beauty for ashes,
a joyous blessing instead of mourning,
festive praise instead of despair.
In their righteousness, they will be like great oaks
that the Lord has planted for his own glory.
4 They will rebuild the ancient ruins,
repairing cities destroyed long ago.
They will revive them,
though they have been deserted for many generations.
5 Foreigners will be your servants. [Gentile slaves? No wonder they became--and most still are--the bitter enemies of the Zionists. Read on.]
They will feed your flocks
and plow your fields
and tend your vineyards.
6 You will be called priests of the Lord,
ministers of our God.
You will feed on the treasures of the nations
and boast in their riches.
7 Instead of shame and dishonor,
you will enjoy a double share of honor.
You will possess a double portion of prosperity in your land,
and everlasting joy will be yours."
=================00000=================
I can't imagine that Jesus believed in a kingdom of God based dictatorial power, greed, bigotry and the like.
One can imagine that Jesus began his sermon with the opening words of Isaiah 61 to get the attention of his fellow Nazarenes. Amos used a similar tactic.
Then here is what I imagine he went on to say, it was something like this:
"As most of you know, I spent forty days in the desert preparing for this day. Yes, I know that you, my beloved people, have the dream that, some day God will build his kingdom on earth. I too have that dream.
I know that you would like me to tell you that I am the long sought-for Messiah; that I am prepared to lead you in a war of victory over the Gentiles, expecially the oppressive Romans; that following this victory I will: restore the wealth, power and glory we had in the days of David and Solomon; that, in the Jerusalem Temple, I will then be crowned as your prophet, priest and king and declare that God's kingdom has finally come..." There was a long pause.
"Yes, I am here to declare that this kingdom is come now...but it is not a kingdom which can be imposed on this world by anyone--king, church or state--who seeks to be loved and worshipped by his people just because he turns stones into bread and power into prosperity. It is a kingdom based on the
THE GREATEST POWER IN THE WORLD, HUMANE LOVE
Humane love is found only in the human and willing spirit. Out of it grows faith, hope, joy, justice, peace and prosperity for all, including the Gentiles...Yes, even those we think of as enemies."
He went on to drive home his message by telling them--no doubt a familiar story--how that, in the time of Elijah and Elisha, God lovingly worked, inclusively, in through and with Gentiles, not just Jews.
At this point his fellow Nazarenes refused to listen. They became so angry they dragged him out of the congregation and were prepared to kill him. He escaped then, but not for long. And until we learn and put into practice the simple lesson of humane love, the killing will go on.
RevLGKing
Posted on: 12/14/2008 20:07
I must add: IMO, Jesus was not opposed to health, wealth and prosperity, but he wanted it to be for all, not just for us. Justice must be for all, or there will be no peace of mind, or any kind, for anyone.
Arminius
Posted on: 12/15/2008 18:42
Yes, RevKing, Jesus was inclusive and non-sectarian. His "kingdom of God" was for everyone. He was not out to denominationalize but to spiritualize the world.
evensong
Posted on: 12/16/2008 13:49
I want to thank you all for your comments--I am trying to understand them all and consider this a wonderful opportunity to get an education for free! It will be January most likely before I can get down to the serious business of trying to figure out exactly what I believe. I will work on my orthodoxy then. Right now it is orthopraxy I must major on, or Christmas is not going to happen at our house :)
The new blog post is a result of the continuing conversation from this first blog entry...
RevLindsayKing
Posted on: 12/24/2008 01:47
Orthopraxy. Interesting word. You mean doing the right thing?
Over the years I have used the same word in sermons, frequently--especially when I preached on the James 2:14-26--the poverty of faith without works.
Do you, or anyone, have you any idea where the words comes from? I used you say: Beliefs are important; but without at least the attempt at orthopraxy, orthodoxy is hypocrisy.
Are aware the Luther, who put all of his faith in faith, described James as an, "epistle of straw"? He debated whether or not to leave it out of his translation of the German Bible.
evensong
Posted on: 12/26/2008 19:47
Etymology:
"Orthopraxy" derives from the Greek "orthos" ("correct" or "straight") + "praxis" ("action"); it denotes "correct behaviour or actions."
http://www.translationdirectory.com/glossaries/glossary014_o.htm
I am under the impression that correct practice was of more importance in Judaism than actual correct beliefs or correct memorized laws and rituals. For instance, a kind and loving Gentile would be counted as righteous without all the deeds of the law being fulfilled. Just loving ones fellow human beings was enough to be counted righteous--like Mr. Schindler who helped those ill-fated Jews to be kept safe in a fake factory producing useless equipment...Many of Schindler's actions were lies but he was telling lies to keep hundreds safe so the goal of loving one's fellows is of the most importance--that is the correct practice of highest value. Important beliefs are also important, but people can make memorization of laws more important then the living out of those laws--called legalism. There is probably a balance one is to keep in mind. Perhaps one of Jesus' parables covers this topic.
RevLindsayKing
Posted on: 01/04/2009 21:17
I will watch for what more you have to say, with interest.
unionvilletim
Posted on: 01/11/2009 01:01
Hi Arminius,
"but no more so than you and I or anyone else"?
I have never fullfilled almost 400 prophesies written upto a thousand years earlier. (see Isaiah 53 or google the prophesies of Jesus). Just look at all the prophies written before Jesus came into the world. How about all the miracles that Jesus performed infront of large crowds that are acknowledged by many secular sources within a few dozen years of his death and resurrection. He himself said he can forgive sin and accepted worship unto himself. He told of his death and resurrection the days leading up to the events. There are so many scholars that are in the top universities that would attest to the evidence of a historical Jesus who lead a unique life so unique like no other person in the history of our planet. Even his birth was bathed in Glory! The well know saying about who Jesus was...and you have three choices.... LIAR LUNATIC OR GOD (Lord) when you look at who he was.
God in human flesh ....God's ultimate Justice for us....the ultimate sacrafice. Freely given for us. The choice is ours whether we accept God's gift.
RevLindsayKing
Posted on: 01/12/2009 18:42
Tim, Lindsay from Thornhill, here. Good to dialogue with you. I agree that the Gospel teaches that Jesus was at one with GOD. But it also teaches that he called us to follow him. I don't think he ever said: "But you will find it impossible to do so." No check out Matthew 5:48: "You must be perfect--just as your Father in heaven is perfect." What a challenge!
QUESTIONS FOR DIALOGUE--that is, AGREEING TO DISAGREE, LOVINGLY. Note: A dialogue is not a debate--where debaters try to prove that they have the monopoly on the Truth. A dialogue is about exploring, with others, ways and means of finding the highest and best possible truth.
In the spirit of dialogue, can you point to me a verse in the Gospels where Jesus ever said: "I am the only one who is, or ever will be, at one with GOD."?
Check out John 10:34. "I have said you are gods." What do you think he had in mind when he said this? [Keep in mind that the original Greek text was in uncials--that is, without upper and lower case letters. Also, there were no punctation marks.]
Check out John 17:20-26. It is all about our oneness with Jesus and GOD. The central verse: "That all may be one." is on the crest of the United Church. BTW, I do not believe it is about the organic union of churches.
Galatians 3:26-29. "It is through faith that all of you (including women) are God's sons in union with Christ Jesus." .... Check the whole passage.
I have heard the above teaching of Paul quoted as the basis of all the modern democratic freedoms. I believe that our at-one-ment with GOD is the source of all freedom. Now that IS Good News! The Gospel.
friendlyghost
Posted on: 02/10/2009 13:51
RevLGKing
Posted on: 07/03/2009 23:56
HOW JESUS BECAME A CHRISTIAN--A new book by professor Barry Wilson of York University.
http://www.barriewilson.com/hjbc.html
Was Jesus a Christian?
http://thewordofme.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/was-jesus-a-christian/
http://www.yorku.ca/akevents/flash/arts_letter/barrie_wilson/