In another thread people have mentioned getting excummunicated from the RC church for seemingly minor things - like taking part in a friend's wedding in a protestant church, or making a donation to a charity that supports a woman's right to choose in the question of abortion.
This is not my understanding of excommunication. I may be wrong, but I thought excommunication was regarded as the ultimate discipline for serious breeches with the RC church, and that it could only come from the head of the church in Rome.
I seriously doubt if the Pope takes time to consider some lay person in the backwoods of Canada either taking part in a wedding (or even getting married in a Protestant church) or giving a $10 donation to an organization the church doesn't support.
I think that excommunication is rare, and reserved for serious things like the King of England challenging the discipline of the RC church and setting himself up as head of the Church of England.
I also think excommunication is permanent. Once excommunicated, always excommunicated.
On the other hand, my husband, who was married by a UCC minister in a UCC church, and twenty years later joined the UCC, has never been excommunicated. All he would have to do to return to the church of his baptism would be to go to confession and begin attending again - he is still a member (in their eyes).
Am I misunderstanding something here? Does anybody know about excommunication from the RC church?
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
chansen
Posted on: 06/18/2013 08:59
Atheists to the rescue!
http://atheism.about.com/od/ideasforatheistactivism/a/Excommunication.htm
Mendalla
Posted on: 06/18/2013 09:03
And Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excommunication#Roman_Catholic_Church
And no, it's not permanent. There are several ways listed that it can be lifted, but all require a return to being a good RC.
Mendalla
revjohn
Posted on: 06/18/2013 09:26
Hi seeler,
This is not my understanding of excommunication. I may be wrong, but I thought excommunication was regarded as the ultimate discipline for serious breeches with the RC church, and that it could only come from the head of the church in Rome.
Excommunication is the ultimate disciplinary tool of the Roman Catholic Church. The seriousness of the breech is often in the eye of the official doing the excommunicating. Rome does not need to approve of excommunication unless the individual facing it ranks high enough in the Church to warrant Rome's involvement.
For example a Priest can decide if a parishioner should be excommunicated. Only a Bishop, or higher can excommunicate a priest. Only a Cardinal can excommunicate a Bishop, The College of Cardinals and the Pope can excommunicate a Cardinal or a Pope.
Excommunication, normally involves prohibiting Roman Catholics from participating in the Eucharist, they are still expected to attend Mass. Participation in the sacrament of confession (a Roman Catholic sacrament) typically resolves the excommunication. Excommunication, for clergy, prohibits them from participating in the Eucharist or presiding over any liturgy. Excommunication is typically resolved following participation in the sacrament of Confession and a public demonstration of repentance.
I seriously doubt if the Pope takes time to consider some lay person in the backwoods of Canada either taking part in a wedding (or even getting married in a Protestant church) or giving a $10 donation to an organization the church doesn't support.
The Pope doesn't need to. There are other offices in the Church which are much more immediate.
I think that excommunication is rare, and reserved for serious things like the King of England challenging the discipline of the RC church and setting himself up as head of the Church of England.
It isn't very rare and it depends upon the priest.
I also think excommunication is permanent. Once excommunicated, always excommunicated.
That is not the case. Excommunication ends when the one who has been excommunicated confesses their sin and repents of it, usually the confession is made to the Priest who did the excommunicating.
The phrase, once Roman Catholic always Roman Catholic might be what you are thinking of.
Am I misunderstanding something here? Does anybody know about excommunication from the RC church?
Just little bits here and there.
Grace and peace to you.
John
chansen
Posted on: 06/18/2013 10:18
And Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excommunication#Roman_Catholic_Church
And no, it's not permanent. There are several ways listed that it can be lifted, but all require a return to being a good RC.
Mendalla
I think the point, typically, is to get yourself excommunicated so you are removed from the list members of the Catholic Church. For some, it may be an act of protest. For others, a final tie to a backward institution severed.
For whatever reason, it's a act that I support, because the Catholic Church deserves to lose members, money, and influence.
From the article I posted:
It is possible to be excommunicated in a specific, official pronouncement, but this is rarely done. More relevant is latae sententiae excommunication, or automatic excommunication, which can occur for the following reasons according to canon law:
[chansen note: snipped stuff you can't or shouldn't do, like assaulting the pope]
Desecrating a consecrated host isn't as bad as assaulting a pope, but it's unlikely that you'd find a way to do this. That leaves one option:
You need to still be some sort of religious theist to be a heretic or schismatic, so if you are a secular atheist the you're only option is apostasy.
There is one more basis for excommunication:
So if one person does something that leads to automatic excommunication, any accomplices that were necessary to the act and who can have the penalty imposed upon them can also be excommunicated. This opens up options for ex-Catholic friends to find ways to help each other get excommunicated.
Process of Excommunication
If you want to be excommunicated, you have to go through official channels. Your local priest can't help you; instead, you must write a letter to your bishop.
If you don't hear back after a little bit, send the letter again — but this time registered mail with a note that this is your second attempt. If you persist, you should be successful.
While I don't understand what is so hard about desecrating a cracker (put one in a condom?), apostasy is probably the best route to take. As the instructions say, make sure you communicate that you knew what you were doing by becoming an apostate, and preferably, take someone with you. They hate that.
Happy excommunication! Don't forget to order a cake and plan a party when it becomes official!
seeler
Posted on: 06/18/2013 15:36
Thanks everyone. I obviously have a lot to learn about excommunication.
I think it is a very cruel judgment, especially for someone who still valued and wanted to be a part of the church they had grown up in and loved all their life. Imagine attending a worship service in which communion was a central part and being forbidden to take part.
I hope it doesn't happen in the UCC. In my congregation we have an open table, not our table but the Lord's table. The invitation is open to all. I have never heard of anyone in my congregation being refused communion.
dreamerman
Posted on: 06/18/2013 16:09
[quote=chansen]Atheists to the rescue! http://atheism.about.com/od/ideasforatheistactivism/a/Excommunication.htm[/quote] I was baptised in the Roman Catholic Church. I know consider myself to be an agnostic-atheist but I don't think it is worth my time to have myself excommunicated. I thought I was no longer a member of the RCC when I joined the UCCan.
Dcn. Jae
Posted on: 06/18/2013 17:04
Well, i will speak to the person being excommunicated for attending his Protestant friend's wedding - as that was my dad's story. I think there are a few notes to be made...
while my father was a bit of a story-teller, he told us of this event in his life with earnest, and i for one believe that it actually happened as he said.
my dad was always a bit of a free-spirited trouble-maker, especially as a youth and young man, and perhaps this was just the proverbial straw that broke the camel"s back.
it took place back in the 1940s. Perhaps the Rc church no lonhger excommunicates for such trifle reasons.
Alex
Posted on: 06/18/2013 17:19
Things have changed over time. No longer are people excommunicated in Canada for attemding non Catholic religious serices. (which was the sin of your father, since the wedding was performed by a minister.) Also today Catholics hold different views on what is allowed and not. Some priests reject the idea of excommunication outright. A good example is a Kenndy, who represented Rhode Island in Congress. His local Bishop considered him excommunicated for his support of abortion rights. Yet there were many Priests who were willing and able to with the support of their Bishop to include him. In palces like New York Washington DC, Boston. In fact his view on abortion rights were not much different than many bishops. and other Priests.
chansen
Posted on: 06/18/2013 17:54
I think it's safe to say the RCC considers you a member.
DKS
Posted on: 06/18/2013 20:57
I hope it doesn't happen in the UCC. In my congregation we have an open table, not our table but the Lord's table. The invitation is open to all. I have never heard of anyone in my congregation being refused communion.
Dcn. Jae
Posted on: 06/18/2013 21:17
At my baptist church all believers in Christ are invited to share in the Table. We are encouraged to examine ourselves first to make sure we're spiritually prepared. That is to say, not in a fight with any other Christian.
BetteTheRed
Posted on: 06/18/2013 22:33
It's okay to be in a fight with a non-Christian?
carolla
Posted on: 06/18/2013 22:34
So ... you could be in a fight with non-Christian people and that would be considered being "spiritually prepared" for communion?
Dcn. Jae
Posted on: 06/19/2013 00:04
The concern is with the unionn of the spiritual family - are you united in fellowsghip with all of youe 8hristian brothers and sistets.
Meredith
Posted on: 06/24/2013 22:58
I know of one very prominent and active Roman Catholic who was excommunicated for being in a relationship with a divorced Protestant. They were cohabitating before their marriage, tongues wagged and the Priest made the call (I believe there was pressure to do so). The Priest had all the authroity to excommunicate and the only way the person could be recommunicated would be to do penance after stopping the offending behavior. Needless to say this person had a major rift with his church and I married them in the United Church. So while the sanctity of the sacrament was well protected, pastorally it was a disaster when several months later the man died suddenly and the Roman Catholic Church had the funeral. I felt terribly sorry for his widow but fortunately she got good care from the local United Church minister.
crazyheart
Posted on: 06/25/2013 14:19
I know you can lose your job in the Catholic School System if you are living with someone especially if they are not Catholic and child is involved.My son's friends had a wedding by Justice of the Peace in their house and then had a wedding in the church with priest etc. so that she could continue teaching.My son was best man.