Panentheism's picture

Panentheism

image

interesting on possiblities

By Philip Clayton
March 25, 2012

"The Rise of the Nones" is one of 10 trends changing American life, according to Time magazine's March 12 cover story. That's because the "nones" — those who mark "none" on surveys that ask them to identify their religious affiliation — are the fastest-growing religious group in the United States.
Not surprisingly, the increase in the unaffiliated comes at the expense of America's mainstream religions, which means that Christianity is taking the biggest hit. Mainstream Protestant churches have lost more than a third of their members since 1960. Evangelical churches are also feeling the pinch; Southern Baptists are hurting. Various surveys illuminate this trend: About 75% of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 now consider themselves "spiritual but not religious." Furthermore, all traditional forms of Christian practice have sharply declined from previous decades (including church attendance, Bible study and prayer), and doubts are much sharper regarding traditional Christian beliefs.
Although a recent bumper crop of pundits likes to proclaim that we'd all be better off with no religion, I suspect that the majority of us believe that religion, in spite of its flaws, offers individuals the inspiration to be better people and to create a better nation. Seminary and church leaders, in particular, are highly motivated to staunch the decline. Unfortunately, many of them believe that what's really needed is a return to the "faith of our fathers," stricter adherence to creeds and (this is America, after all) better marketing methods.
I advocate a radically different solution: the Emerging Church. It's a movement based on understanding the reasons for mainstream religion's dramatic decline: improved scientific understanding, changing social norms, an increasingly pluralistic religious culture and more freedom to doubt and question — a freedom that until the last three centuries was mostly absent or suppressed and that is still resisted, sometimes violently, in much of the world today.
In my experience, the nones are not rejecting God. They are rejecting doctrinal requirements that they no longer find believable, along with the rigid structures of many organized religions. For that reason, the rise of the nones may well be a new kind of spiritual awakening, one in which doubters are welcome.
In the Christian tradition, for example, the Emerging Church invites participation from all who find themselves attracted to the teachings, actions and person of Jesus. It isn't crucial that members call themselves Christians, or that they believe Bible stories literally (rather than metaphorically), or even that they are believers rather than agnostics and atheists. As long as people want to sincerely engage with the teachings of Jesus and with the communities that seek to live by those values — "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," "Love your neighbor," "Blessed are the peacemakers" — they are welcome.
Given that there are already almost 10,000 religions in the world, Jewish author Eric Weiner writes that we need to "invent not a new religion but, rather, a new way of being religious." As the dean of a theology school, I see the Emerging Church attracting an incredible diversity of people into new and experimental kinds of religious community. The lapsed faithful, exhausted refugees from mainline faiths, former evangelicals, frustrated Catholics and seekers with no background at all in organized religion are creating (in Weiner's beautiful phrase) "a religious space that celebrates doubt, encourages experimentation and allows one to utter the word God without embarrassment."
The leaders of the movement share a common fascination with the radical teachings of Jesus, but the communities they form vary widely. Meeting sites range from homes to pubs to parks to churches to convention centers. These groups aren't rigidly hierarchical either; their leaders are more often hosts and conveners than preachers and teachers of doctrine.
Examples of these new institutions include Ikon, a group of mostly 20-somethings that meets in a bar in Belfast, Northern Ireland; Journey, a Dallas church that convenes in pubs, restaurants and a center for the mentally disabled; and Solomon's Porch, a community in Minneapolis that has working groups for the arts, education and outreach. Some mainline churches are joining the Emerging Church movement. In Southern California, All Saints, an Episcopal church in Pasadena, offers traditional Sunday services in its beautiful cathedral but also has myriad groups engaged in social justice and compassion programs throughout the community, as well as weekly forums where a wide range of views, including those of atheists and representatives of other faiths, are vigorously discussed.
No matter their size or structure, communities like these offer a vital connection to the infinite grace and compassion of what I'll call the ultimate reality that binds us all — however that reality is understood (or doubted) by each of their members.
Emerging Christians don't have a monopoly on spirituality for the nones, however. L.A.'s East Side Jews often meet for discussion, comedy nights or outreach projects. Although they bill themselves as "an irreverent, non-denominational collective for Jews with confused identities," their events usually have a spiritual thread as well. In one meeting the group invited Jewish and Muslim comics, and professors from Claremont Lincoln University, the inter-religious consortium I work with, to take questions from the membership and their invited Muslim guests. The discussion ranged from hilarious to deeply spiritual, and participants were clearly moved.
I see an immense yearning for these kinds of communities in America. If religious leaders can quit idolizing doctrinal purity and instead create a place for people who doubt and question as well as those who believe, I believe faith in America will have a vital future. And these new models for "church" will be better equipped to work collaboratively with all Americans, no matter what their religion.
Philip Clayton is the dean of Claremont School of Theology, a member of the Claremont Lincoln University consortium. His most recent book is "The Predicament of Belief: Science, Philosophy, and Faith," which he coauthored with Steven Knapp.
 

Share this

Comments

gecko46's picture

gecko46

image

Very thought-provoking and informative post.  Thanks Pan.

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

I just recently listened to Clayton discussing the book in a lecture and Q&A that was podcast on Homebrewed Christianity. He does have some interesting ideas and it is available from Kobo so may pick it up at some point. I do like his style. Not too serious or full of himself like some theologians and even has a pretty lively sense of humour. Not sure if that comes through in his writing or just in his lecture style.

 

Philip Clayton wrote:

I see an immense yearning for these kinds of communities in America. If religious leaders can quit idolizing doctrinal purity and instead create a place for people who doubt and question as well as those who believe, I believe faith in America will have a vital future. And these new models for "church" will be better equipped to work collaboratively with all Americans, no matter what their religion.

 

I think he hits the nail on the head, at least for me, right here. Then again, as a UU it's pretty much my statement of faith (doubt and questioning rather than doctrinal purity).

 

That said, my own re-engagement with Christianity, Emerging or otherwise, is probably finished for now. I've come to the realization that it isn't helping or changing me in any real way and is really more of a intellectual curiousity than a real move back to some kind of faith. Fortunately, I'm a "UU" rather than a "None" so I'm not part of that movement away from religion, but my current analysis of what I really believe and practice suggests that religion may not be the best term for it.

 

Really, I'm more of a blend of pantheism and Epicurean philosophy with a bit of Stoicism thrown in for good measure. More of a philosophy than a faith, really.

 

Mendalla

 

somegalfromcan's picture

somegalfromcan

image

This Emerging Church idea is really interesting. A few churches in our presbytery have been getting together to host a series of gatherings around this idea. Basically, we listen to a recording of someone like Bruce Sanguin speaking, and then break into small groups to discuss what's been said. The first series ran in the Fall and it was so popular that we'll be bringing it back and adding more events (like a weekend with the aforementioned Bruce Sanguin).

Mendalla's picture

Mendalla

image

somegalfromcan wrote:

This Emerging Church idea is really interesting. A few churches in our presbytery have been getting together to host a series of gatherings around this idea. Basically, we listen to a recording of someone like Bruce Sanguin speaking, and then break into small groups to discuss what's been said. The first series ran in the Fall and it was so popular that we'll be bringing it back and adding more events (like a weekend with the aforementioned Bruce Sanguin).

 

I heard Sanguin preach at Wesley-Knox United in London last year. Didn't go to any of the lectures he did on the same visit, but based on the sermon I'd say you can't go wrong with him. Wonderful speaker and some great ideas.

 

Mendalla

 

somegalfromcan's picture

somegalfromcan

image

I'm really looking forward to the weekend. Our church happens to be the one hosting this event and will get the benefit of his preaching on Sunday morning too.

InannaWhimsey's picture

InannaWhimsey

image

it certainly is an exciting time to be alive

 

(so the GVRD is at the forefront of the new reality, with 1/3 of it's population having 'no religion')

Pilgrims Progress's picture

Pilgrims Progress

image

It's the way forward for faith and spirituality.............

Thanks for this, Pan.

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

This is really good. Thanks, Pan. In my experience, people have been rejecting the doctrinal aspects of Christianity since I was born in the early 70's...my parents generation were probably first to leave the church in large numbers. I don't have the stats on that...but I was raised by parents (on the BC coast) who swung between atheist and agnostic, with roots in the more traditional church...but always came at Biblical interpretation from a metaphorical angle in our household. Visiting other's more conservative Sunday schools as a kid, for me, was confusing. As I got older, in the back of my mind, there was always a lingering feeling and a desire to be more spiritual......that there is a God, a Creator...but the "believe this or you're not one of us", or even worse "believe this or you're going to hell", aspect was discouraging and kept me away from church.  Quite honestly, as a youth and younger adult I cringed when someone mentioned Christianity...I began to assoicate it with fundamentalist prosletyzing....not realizing the range of different interpretations out there. My parents feel almost the same way, have for years, interestingly. so, perhaps I picked up that bias from them too...or from society in general. The fundamentalist evangelical churches do have a commanding presence, while the others have faded into the background unnoticed. The two streotypes my parents seemed to equate with the church are, evangelical fundemntalism, or the old fashioned "frozen chosen" that they grew up with...neither of which appeal to them at all. The only other option I really knew about was Unitarianism, while not offensive to me--I''ve been to a few interesting services-- seemed like a bit too much of a mixed bag of dabbling in different faith traditions to gain any solid faith grounding and spiritual depth. Too much for me to keep up with. I was never quite sure what was what there. I'm interested in learning about different faiths, but not practicing a little bit of all of them...if that makes sense. However, one of my "baby boomer" relatives has also become quite interested in the emerging church concept and some of the newer ideas (e.g. Marcus Borg)...he left a couple of decades ago, because he felt if he had to believe things that just didn't fit with his reality, or pretend to, he shouldn't be there.

 

So this might not only attract younger people who've never felt they fit in a traditional church, but bring back some of the baby boomers who left years ago for similar reasons.

Back to Church Life topics
cafe