MikePaterson's picture

MikePaterson

image

A time to give?

From the BBC:

------------------------

Half a billion children could grow up physically and mentally stunted over the next 15 years because they do not have enough to eat, the charity Save the Children says in a new report.

It says much more needs to be done to tackle malnutrition in the world's poorest countries.

The charity found that many families could not afford meat, milk or vegetables.

The survey covered families in India, Bangladesh, Peru, Pakistan and Nigeria.

One parent in six said their children were abandoning school to help out by working for food.

A third of parents surveyed said their children complained about not having enough to eat.

The survey was carried out in the five countries - where, the agency says, half the world's malnourished children live - by international polling agency Globescan.

Record food prices

Save the Children said that a year of record food prices had worsened child malnutrition and could hit progress reducing child deaths.

"The world has made dramatic progress in reducing child deaths, down from 12 to 7.6 million, but this momentum will stall if we fail to tackle malnutrition," said Save the Children chief executive Justin Forsyth.

The agency wants the UK to lead the way in reducing hunger and protecting children from food price rises - starting with a Hunger Summit when world leaders are in London for the Olympics.

The UK's International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, said the charity was right to focus on hunger and malnutrition, and Britain would "continue to urge other countries to match our own efforts in this area".

In its report, Save the Children says that one in four of the world's children have stunted growth - meaning their body and brain have failed to develop properly due to malnutrition.

Eighty percent of stunted children live in just four countries, the charity says.

Malnutrition contributes to the deaths of 2.6 million children each year, according to the report.

Assumpta Ndumi, a nutritionist who works with Save the Children in Kenya, told the BBC's Network Africa programme that successive droughts are causing a downward spiral there:

"Milk is very important for families in north-eastern Kenya, so when livestock is lost they basically have no access to a protein source.

"We need to address the hidden hunger because it's killing silently."

Food prices rose sharply in the first half of last year, according to the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), after severe weather in some of the world's biggest food exporting countries in 2010 damaged supplies.

The FAO's Food Price Index rose last month for the first time since July 2011, but was still 7% lower than in January 2011.

----------

AS one of the World's wealthiest nations, Canada is mandated to provide international aid to the tune of 0.7 per ecnt of GNP. First pledged in a 1970 General Assembly Resolution, a 1970, the 0.7 target has oftyen been affirmed in international agreements over the years since then. 

In 2005, Canada — not alone in under-giving — managed to contribute 0.34 per cent. Today, amidst rhetoric of greater effectiveness and efficiency,  it's down to 0.25 percent.

Given our GDP of nearly $40,500 per person in 2011, compared with, say, Peru's $10,000, India's $3,700. Nigeria's $2,589, Bangladesh's $1,697, Liberia's $400… could we not maybe share a bit more, rather than a bit less, especially to the poorest?

Economic development is not something that can be done alone… it is a global issue.

Share this

Comments

Jim Kenney's picture

Jim Kenney

image

Sad but true.   Also complex.  It is a time to give, but the giving needs to be strategic.

MikePaterson's picture

MikePaterson

image

Our idea of of "strategic" has tended to relate to our trade and strategic interests; that has to change. We also have to remember that poverty goes a long way towards shaping environments in which what we call "corruption" is encouraged, tolerated and even accepted. The places of greatest need are likely to be places of social breakdown and degradation… which it's why it's very much in the global interest to end poverty. Poverty in various ways generates social and political instability and gives licence to extremist regimes.

 

It think it's more important to see poverty as a moral issue: as clear evidence of moral failure on the part of the rich.  That longstanding aid target of 0.7 per cent of GNP would have a neglible impact on wealthy countries — if it didn't, it would not have been eagerly put in place, and many of us, individually, give rather more than that to the causes and charities we support. To be contributing LESS THAN HALF of an already fairly miserly target is tantamount to criminal negligence. We we spend what we do on defence to guard ourselves from the sorts of instability poverty engenders, we may be making the wrong choice. 

graeme's picture

graeme

image

wealth depends on poverty. The industrial growth of the west was made possible by impoverishing people all over the world, including in the west. For Canada, it's worth reading Terry Copp, The Anatomy of Poverty.

Every nation that became wealthy became so by impoverishing its own people. (I recall a small book called Made in Canada. It shows pictures of living conditions for Canadians about a century ago, especially in the cities.

The Soviet Union achieved its growth in the same way. And China is doing it now. It seems to have nothing to do with the declared ism.

Nor does the growth appear to be permanent. Ask anyone in Greece or Ireland or Britain. as the one and a half million homseless children in the US.

Canada has not only been cheap in its aid. Much of the "aid" has done more for business supporters of the government that it has for the poor.

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

Right after WWII, which was not a very prosperous time even for the more prosperous nations, there was massive food aid coming into Germany. Due to this, we children in elementary school had a school meal every day, which prevented starvation and gave growing children the essential basic nutrients. We also got powdered milk, cheddar cheese, egg powder, flour and clothing through the German Lutheran Church, donated by North American Christian Churches. In addition, we children begged from the American occupiers (I lived in the American occupied zone) and the American soldiers were extremely generous.

 

All of this food aid, plus monetray aid via the Marshall Plan, proved very fruitful. After a few years, Germany was on its feet again and able to donate to needy countries in Africa.

 

I think there is a certain donour fatigue in the West because, after 50 or 60 years of donating, things don't seem to change, or actually get worse, for some African countries. The aid to post-WWII Germany was a helping hand, of which Germany took full advantage to pull itself out of the post-war devastation and poverty within a few short years. But some African countries seem to be chronic welfare cases that go on and on. Their problems are largely political, and we can't resolve those problems for them. Neither can we attach conditions to our food aid.

Back to Global Issues topics
cafe