MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT
From Thursday's Globe and Mail
December 11, 2008 at 3:43 AM EST
For years, the Bush administration was lambasted for its role at UN climate-change talks, but environmentalists say Canada is at risk of becoming the developed country most criticized for its lack of interest in tackling global warming.
Environmentalists are focusing on Canada's role at the current round of talks in the Polish city of Poznan, where delegates from more than 190 countries are meeting this week to try to draft a new United Nations treaty to extend controls on greenhouse-gas emissions after the Kyoto Protocol expires at the end of 2012.
South Africa's Environment Minister, Marthinus van Schalkwyk, took the unusual step of issuing a statement criticizing Canada by name, along with Japan, Russia and Australia, saying the countries have not issued "credible and ambitious" targets for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions by 2020.
Canada's chief negotiator at the talks, Michael Martin, has drawn attention as well by balking at buying emission credits to help the country meet its Kyoto targets, dismissing them as the purchase of "hot air." Canada also objected to moves to grant indigenous people land rights in plans to protect tropical forests.
"Canada is becoming more and more isolated," said Steven Guilbeault, spokesman for Équiterre, a Montreal-based environmental group. "I'm not sure that this is what Canadians would expect from their government, to be one of the bad guys on the international scene."
Environment Canada has defended the government's position, saying in a statement that its negotiators "are working constructively with other parties" to reach an agreement on combatting climate change.
More details of Canada's position at the talks, known formally as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, could emerge today during the high-level ministerial part of the discussions. Environment Minister Jim Prentice is expected to make an address this morning.
Canada has had one of the poorest records in the developing world in controlling greenhouse-gas emissions. It is about 30 per cent above its Kyoto target, which called for the country to cut greenhouse gases by 6 per cent below 1990 levels from 2008 to 2012.
An assessment released in conjunction with the Poznan talks ranked Canada second to last out of the 57 largest greenhouse-gas emitters in its performance in fighting climate change. Only Saudi Arabia was ranked worse in the assessment, known as the Climate Change Performance Index.
"Canada's climate performance could hardly be worse, and we're still moving in the wrong direction," said Matthew Bramley, a spokesman for environmental think tank the Pembina Institute, who contributed to the assessment study.
Another blow to Canada at the talks came from the apparent resignation of senior Environment Canada scientist Don MacIver as chair of the organizing committee for the World Meteorological Organization's climate conference.
He was to have spoken at the talks, with his travel costs covered by the WMO, but Ottawa refused to give him permission to attend.
Mr. MacIver declined to comment on the circumstances around his resignation, and Environment Canada wouldn't say why he wasn't sent to the talks.
"We cannot and will not discuss how internal decisions were made on the delegation composition," said Sujata Raisinghani, a spokeswoman for Environment Canada.
She said that while the WMO was paying for Mr. MacIver's travel, the federal government was still responsible for his salary and the department has to be "accountable for every penny of tax dollars spent."
Environmentalists say that not having senior scientists participate in the talks further diminishes Canada's stature at the negotiations.
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
LBmuskoka
Posted on: 12/11/2008 06:56
The United Nations Climate Change Conference, Poznań, Poland - COP 14 1-12 December 2008
Oh we can beat them-forever and ever
Then we could be heroes-just for one day
David Bowie, Heroes
sighsnootles
Posted on: 12/11/2008 08:18
good lord.
i recommend everyone get some solar panels. obviously the government isn't going to do it for us here.
abpenny
Posted on: 12/11/2008 08:25
All Canadians should be embarrassed and concerned about this. It will be interesting to hear a statement from Don McIver....
RevMatt
Posted on: 12/11/2008 08:52
Yet another legacy of the Harper years. Yay us.
Birthstone
Posted on: 12/11/2008 10:07
and today we rank LAST on a list of 25 developed countries for Child care. Amazing what a few short years will do.
alta
Posted on: 12/11/2008 12:12
Yet another legacy of the Harper years. Yay us.
I disagree. There's 35 million of who need to share the blame. Our environment didn't go to crap in 2 years. Sighs is right (dammit!), we ALL need to do our part.
RevMatt
Posted on: 12/11/2008 15:25
Of course, Alta. But every nation in the world that HAS made progress, has only done it through government action. We could have had that, but instead we have had a government that actively made the environment WORSE, on many fronts.
alta
Posted on: 12/11/2008 17:30
but instead we have had a government that actively made the environment WORSE, on many fronts.
Correction: EVERY government we have ever had, has made the environment worse. The point I was making is that it is not fair, or honest, to use Harper as your sole whipping boy on the environment. While he certainly hasn't done any more, nor has he done any less than any other PM.
nighthawk
Posted on: 12/11/2008 17:57
Well, I wouldn't say Harper hasn't done less, he scrapped Kyoto after the Liberal government made Canada one of the first signatories.
killer_rabbit79
Posted on: 12/11/2008 18:50
I disagree. There's 35 million of who need to share the blame. Our environment didn't go to crap in 2 years. Sighs is right (dammit!), we ALL need to do our part.
This is the government's responsibility. We pay our taxes so that they can support the Kyoto Protocol. Sighs is right because our government is to lazy and immature to act on it's own so we're the only ones that have any chance of making progress, not because it's our responsibility to do this.
alta
Posted on: 12/11/2008 19:49
Well, I wouldn't say Harper hasn't done less, he scrapped Kyoto after the Liberal government made Canada one of the first signatories.
.....and then completely ignored it.
MikePaterson
Posted on: 12/11/2008 20:37
We lag on aboriginal rights too.
somegirl
Posted on: 12/11/2008 22:10
I think that we as Canadians have bought our own hype. We are a great country, or so we keep telling ourselves. Yet we are doing so poorly compared to our western counterparts on child care, child poverty, mental health, and the enviroment, EI has been building a surplus instead of helping the people that it is supposed to just to name a few. If you use the 10 times principle to compare ourselves to the US we have lost more jobs here than there but we are a great country and we are in great shape.
I really don't think that you can blame Harper for all this mess either. The liberals spun their wheels on all these issues for years and years. Not that Harper has made it any better. Chretien's child poverty cure was to lower the poverty line, and all it cost to raise thousands of children out of poverty was the cost of the ink in the pen. That didn't put any food in those kids stomachs but at least it made it look like he was doing something.
RevMatt
Posted on: 12/11/2008 22:56
Oh, the Liberals have been universally useless on the environment. They would not be, had Dion won, but they have been historically.
By contrast, Harper has been openly hostile to environmental concerns. Empty lip service is still better than open hostility.
LBmuskoka
Posted on: 12/12/2008 08:02
By contrast, Harper has been openly hostile to environmental concerns. Empty lip service is still better than open hostility.
And this is indeed the situation. This conference is not the first that a representative of the Harper government has been openly critical of scientific facts presented on climate change and the role Canada plays.
There is also the issue that this problem is beyond the control of individual Canadians - of course each of us needs to do our part but to truly achieve the reduction in emissions that are needed goes far beyond our capabilities. This individual participation is a myth governments have been promoting for too long.
The single biggest contributor to Greenhouse Emissions is the generation of electricity from power stations - Annual Greenhouse Emissions By Sector. While reducing our individual usage the reliance on fossil fuel power generation will negate our individual efforts.
The Government injects millions - probably billions - into the Canadian economy via either direct grants or indirect tax credits. It could stimulate research and development into tangible methods of reducing emissions - but the desire to do so must be there and to date this desire has been patently lacking.
In September 2008 the Sierra Club of Canada issued an Environmental Report Card on all the major Federal parties' environmental plans. Read it for yourself and then ask the question - Is our government doing enough?
Sierra Club Voters Guide to Climate Crisis Election
LB
Today we have a temporary aberration called “industrial capitalism” which is inadvertently liquidating its two most important sources of capital.. the natural world and properly functioning societies. No sensible capitalist would do that. Amory Lovins
ninjafaery
Posted on: 12/12/2008 08:14
I agree with Somegirl that Canadians tend to be myopic about our dismal performance vis a vis other developed nations in many areas including Kyoto.
We're too busy breaking our arm patting ourselves on the back.