crazyheart's picture

crazyheart

image

How Dangerous are these People?

Members of Congress Receiving Death Threats; Congresswoman Blames Sarah Palin's 'Rhetoric'

Posted:
03/25/10

-->

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Wednesday that at least 10 members of Congress have received threats since the health care reform bill passed Sunday night and that the FBI is investigating.

"We've had very serious incidents that have occurred in the last 48 or 72 hours," Hoyer said. "The incidents of threats, whether in person or through telephones or through other communication devices, have given great concern to members for the safety of themselves and their families."

Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that she had reported two "alarming" incidents to the FBI since Sunday -- one at her district office, where a brick was thrown though a window, and another at her campaign offices, where a caller left voice mail referencing snipers.

Slaughter pointed to Sarah Palin specifically for "fanning the flames with coded rhetoric" against Democrats. After the health care bill passed, Palin wrote on her Twitter account, "Commonsense Conservatives and Lovers of America: Don't retreat. Instead RELOAD!"

Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) angrily tweeted back to Palin Wednesday, "Reload? Is your choice of words inciteful or ignorant?"

Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Democrat from Michigan, said Sunday that his wife had received threatening phone calls at the family's home in Michigan throughout the health care debate. CBS News reported that one message left for Stupak said, "I hope you die."

Rep. Tom Perriello (D-Va.) said the FBI is investigating a ruptured gas line at his brother's house just days after his address was posted online by Virginia Tea Party members. Apparently, they intended to post the congressman's home address but published his brother's by mistake.

Hoyer joined his fellow Democrats in saying that Republican leaders need to lower their rhetoric and speak out loudly against the threats against members of Congress. "Any show of appreciation for such actions encourages such actions and ought not to be done," he said.

Minority Leader John Boehner condemned threats of violence, Politico reported.

"I know many Americans are angry over this health care bill, and that Washington Democrats just aren't listening," Boehner said. "But, as I've said, violence and threats are unacceptable. That's not the American way. We need to take that anger and channel it into positive change. Call your congressman, go out and register people to vote, go volunteer on a political campaign, make your voice heard -- but let's do it the right way."

Share this

Comments

Granton's picture

Granton

image

 I think that the anger and tension in America is building up for a LOT of reasons.  People are fed up, sick and tired, a war that has no end, an economy that is going down the tubes and many elected people just aren't appreciating that or addressing that.  The people of America are seeing a lot going out - and not much coming back.

 

Now, before everyone jumps all over me.  I am not excusing violence.  None of this makes me a right wing looney.   What I think Canadians fail to appreciate is just how much of a cultural difference the accepted approach to health care is in the States.  So much so, that we get all smug and look down our noses at them.  It's a divide between Canada and the US that is enormous.  And we can't approach the debate from the starting point of "their dangerous - they don't think like us..."

 

 

graeme's picture

graeme

image

The US has been living in a growing hysteria at least since Senator McCarthy and his Unamerican Activities Committee.

INdeed, the US is almost unique in the world in having comittee with such a name. I have rarely, if ever, heard the terms Umcanadian or Unpolish or Unspanish. The people who oppose a certain view, then, are not just opponents. They are traitors, destroyers of some official vision of what America is.

Politicians have learned to prey on that hysteria ever since, so the people now widely accept torture, genocide, mass murder of civilians in war, domestic spyig, indefinite imprisonment with no charge or lawyer or trial, and a president who now officially has he right to have American abroad killed "on suspicion" - and the whole country goes into wild hysteria when a man on an airplane is found to have an explosive in this underwear. So they except airport restrictions which almost paralyze the airports.

Killiing is American as the stars and stripes. So these people are very dangerous. with not just  sympathizers like Coulter, but people high in political circles like Palin, and still other in congress.

I should be very surprised if we do not see political killings.

Some of t his hyseria is spilling over into Canada, as it was bound to.

spiritbear's picture

spiritbear

image

It really shows how important identity is and the lengths to which people will go when that concept gets challenged. (I wonder how Canadians would respond if Harper decided to privitize the fed's share of medicare. Threats of general strikes maybe?) 

 

The US was founded (or at least expanded) on an idology of individualism - "I am self-made. I can do everything myself".  As a part of that philosophy, "government" in general (and the taxes required to carry out its responsibilities) was a bad idea. It's a philosophy that Harper has brandished before. It leads to the thinking that all cutbacks are OK because everything that government does is BAD anyhow.  (Except when it comes to war - guess what: you can't run a war on voluntary contributions!). Pooling resources (and that's what government health insurance is - the maximum pooling possible) runs counter to an individualistic identity because then I am dependent on others and on government. And the course of action to an individualist is to "take things in his own hands" - which rationalizes (in their minds) violence as the only remaining action available to the individual. 

Witch's picture

Witch

image

I suspect this has very liuttle to do with health care reforms.

 

I suspect you'd see the same kind of polarity and rancour if they were voting on the next new colour of M&M's

crazyheart's picture

crazyheart

image

I think we will see some deaths in the name of the constitution. I hope not.

Feral's picture

Feral

image

Buddy of mine posted a quote by his friend.  Seemed appropriate:

 

'A "militia leader" named Mike Vanderboegh, called for the breaking of windows in Democratic Offices all over the country. It seems that people are answering his call. People that oppose Health Care Reform call President Obama a Nazi but they are engaged in their very own Crystal Night.'

crazyheart's picture

crazyheart

image

Yes they were playing that clip all last night.

LBmuskoka's picture

LBmuskoka

image

crazyheart wrote:

Boehner said. "But, as I've said, violence and threats are unacceptable. That's not the American way.

 

Am I the only one who found this statement funny - not in a ha ha way but in a "is this man delusional" way?

 

The US was born out of revolution.  As a nation,  they elevated armed response to mythic proportions and then are surprised that the people see it as appropriate.

 

 

LB - shaking her head


Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

      John F. Kennedy

Geoli's picture

Geoli

image

I've read that the Sarah Palin's FB visual(map of the US with crosshairs on certain democrats) is not illegal.  It is fairly obvious that it is immoral as it could (and probably has) incite violence in the current political climate.  I can't figure her out though.  She has gotten elected as governor, almost became VP of the US, is wildly famous but is she a lucky dimwit or totally lacking in empathy for whoever could be hurt?  A narcissistic numpty or a sociopath?

lastpointe's picture

lastpointe

image

there was a scary quote iin the globe today.  Some republican stating that Sarah Palin the the party's best hope for the future.

 

Oh my God, can you imagine!

graeme's picture

graeme

image

/we're looking at the last days of Rome.

Geoli's picture

Geoli

image

Anyone care to take a stab at Palin?  Narcissistic numpty or sociopath?  Or something else?

Northwind's picture

Northwind

image

I quite like that label "narcissistic numpy".........I am not sure if it fits her.........there certainly is a narcissistic quality to her......how do you define "numpy"?

 

I think we are looking at the fall of an empire, especially if Sarah Palin is their best hope. On so many levels. Scary.

crazyheart's picture

crazyheart

image

And I heard today that Sarah Palin is campaigning with John McCain this weekend. Was the last Presidential campaign a game for the both of them and they want to start again?

Alex's picture

Alex

image

Geoli wrote:

Anyone care to take a stab at Palin?  Narcissistic numpty or sociopath?  Or something else?

From Wikipeadia

Histrionic personality disorder (HPD) is defined by the American Psychiatric Association as a personality disorder characterized by a pattern of excessive emotionality and attention-seeking, including an excessive need for approval and inappropriate seductiveness, usually beginning in early adulthood. These individuals are lively, dramatic, enthusiastic, and flirtatious.

They may be inappropriately sexually provocative, express strong emotions with an impressionistic style, and be easily influenced by others. Associated features may include egocentrism, self-indulgence, continuous longing for appreciation, feelings that are easily hurt, and persistent manipulative behavior to achieve their own needs.

 

This is fun. Who can guess at the diagnoses for  Ann Coulter, or Stephen Harper, or Glenn Beck?

graeme's picture

graeme

image

Beshpin, we agree. Though I think American democracy was never what it claimed to be, and certainly has all but vanished in recent decades. As a result, the whole nation is drowing in hatreds that few even understand. There's a strong possibility of widespread viiolence.

jon71's picture

jon71

image

In the Nashville Tennessean there was an article about a guy picking up his 10 year old daughter from school. Some guy (a retiree) in an S.U.V. noticed his Obama-Biden bumper sticker. He began by yelling and swearing at him and flipping him the bird. Then he ran into him. The dad thought it was an accident and stopped intending to get out to check the damage, get insurance info, etc. Then the guy rammed him again, the young daughter obviously terrified. Luckily there were no physical injuries and Joe road rage now faces charges of two counts of reckless endangerment, driving under the influence, fleeing the scene of an accident, and refusing to take a field sobriety test. I did the math and the maximum sentence he could get is four years, thirty days, and no drivers license. Yes, alcohol was a big factor, but undeniably this is a result of what happens when the well is poisoned. I have very strong opinions myself, no two ways about it, but I can't imagine reaching a point where I think ramming someone with my car is a way to express that. That girl was the same age as my baby, I can't imagine. Kids have to be off-limits and the line of how we debate things has to be drawn far short of threats of violence and acts of violence. I've been hearing the term "isolated incident" so much lately the irony is palpable. I truly hope for something like this it really is isolated.

Marzo's picture

Marzo

image

These people are very dangerous and it is impossible to reason with them.  They don't believe in freedom or democracy, no matter what they say to the contrary.

This raises questions about who is the "mastermind" behind this campaign of lies and violence.  Palin is a disgusting idiot and so are all her supporters.  The republican party is a cesspool and the United States is doomed as a "civilized society".

stoneeyeball's picture

stoneeyeball

image

In the United States, they take all their politics too seriously.  They shoot their politicians while we just ding them on the Royal Canadian Air Farce, or This Hour Has Twenty Two Minutes, etc.  Unfortunately, they seem to be on a downward spiral that won't stop until it's done a lot of damage. 

kaythecurler's picture

kaythecurler

image

In my opinion the US is a violent, ignorant nation - not that all its citizens fit those wrods but overall....

They have an unfortunate tendency to shoot their best leaders.  I hope Obama and his family are succesfully protected .

 

Granton's picture

Granton

image

 Don't rule out the possibility that these "attacks" are staged events to invoke sympathy.  The Obama campaign vandalised itself in Denver in 2008 for the very same reason.  

 

http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_13203950

 

 

 

LBmuskoka's picture

LBmuskoka

image

Granton, was it really a sanctioned "Obama campaign" or was it a 24 year old male throwing rocks through windows who happened to have collect $500 for going door to door for the Democrats 2 years ago?  Would he have canvassed for the Republicans if they paid $600?

 

 

LB - waxing rhetorically


He steps on stage and draws the sword of rhetoric, and when he is through, someone is lying wounded and thousands of others are either angry or consoled.

     Pete Hamill

Granton's picture

Granton

image

I'm just saying it can't be ruled out.  

Health Care Issue aside, politics is rough and dirty on both sides.  The Dems rush and portray themselves as victims, and it puts a chill on anyone who might want to criticize them.  The focus shifts away from the Bill, and becomes one of "if you don't agree with us, you are apart of this violent mob."  It's a simple way to thwart any opposition.  Fox, CNN will love running stories about "violent extremists."  Meanwhile, people for whatever reason who don't like the bill - will get the message: Shut up!

 

 

 

 

 

LBmuskoka's picture

LBmuskoka

image

Granton wrote:

I'm just saying it can't be ruled out.  

Nor can it be ruled in.  The evidence of motivation is not clear and therefore the implication is empty rhetoric.

Granton wrote:

It's a simple way to thwart any opposition.

 

A far more effective way to thwart opposition is to deflect attention from the topic at hand.  Those employing empty rhetoric have no concrete argument and therefore start lobbing about non sequiturs like cherry bombs.  The debate then becomes clouded in billows of smoke and the logical argument gets trampled in the stampede.

 

I am fully aware that both sides do it and that the media drinks it up like frat boys at a keg party, but the viewing voting public could stop the whole sorry mess by saying "what a load of BS" and not get sucked into the manure pile. 

 

 

LB


Freedom has cost too much blood and agony to be relinquished at the cheap price of rhetoric. 
          Thomas Sowell

Judd's picture

Judd

image

Alex - that disorder has another name,

Show Business.

Back to Politics topics