BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

Organised Crime in Alberta and Elsewhere - Experiences

Hello :-)  [ Draft for Wildwood Residents – Calgary, AB … Modified for posting ],

People likely don’t know that I opposed construction of a 'monster house' at Wildwood’s western edge and with the help residents; plans were terminated in March 2008.  This post is being based on what’s being delivered to them and after the “****”s is what will be a more widely distributed brief.  It discusses the possibility of risqué photography of underage girls, my public reaction to that unsavoury possibility around Sep. 1, 2012 and mostly, events that quickly escalated following those written concerns.  I'm unclear whether, as a photographer, I was being coerced into shooting pornography, framed for it or something else entirely, but the participation of some criminal element seems clear.

The tie-in to Wildwood housing is speculative, but with what's being exposed in Quebec and corruption of their construction industry, my first thought is that I'm being targeted as a form of retribution for getting in the way of monster house construction.  This isn't the kind of world I want my kids to grow up in, or their kids or theirs, etc., and I doubt anyone else does either, unless you’re one of the many working with them (many, according to police and press).  Therefore, I humbly ask that recipients request their MP, MLA or similar for an inquiry about corruption in Alberta – or all of Canada – because that if nothing is done, our kids will be dealing with the type of criminals I’ve encountered.  I suggest contacting the press as well – until this gets publically ‘out there’.

And since context matters for understanding and acceptance – especially of the unusual – please see the related links that follow but also please note that the start of events documented in the attached PDF well predates all of this (indeed, I was sadly oblivious to these events):

Sep 18:  http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/The+National/About+the+Show/Diana+Swain/I...
Sep 20:  http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/TV+Shows/The+National/About+the+Show/Diana...
Oct 3:  http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/ID/2286705179/

As per the last video above, try extending the contents/concepts of the first two videos to Alberta - which is what is happening - and also possibly to the rest of Canada.  Plus, please see:

http://www.thestarphoenix.com/opinion/Canada+needs+target+mafia/7347624/...
http://www.outdoorsmenforum/showthread.php?t=117994

If upon reading the attachment you find parts just unfathomable,  I ask that you still take it seriously and consider redistributing.  Please present it however you want.  Suggest that it may be a piece of fiction, a wild rant or whatever… but with enough distribution it should eventually get to someone who knows about the parasites I've been forced to deal with and will understand the likelihood or possibility of events I’ve documented.  They are more than just possible – they happen.

While I refer to the anonymous group mentioned as 'organised crime', I really can't say who 'they' are.  As per the Quebec Corruption Inquiry, they could be "Mafia" or similar, but I hope we find out.  All I really know is from my experiences; they're very well financed and can be invasive.  They should be taken to task and membership in organised crime groups like this be made illegal, as it is in Italy with the Mafia.
I mention one big reason why I couldn’t get this to the right police authorities, but there are other reasons so I'm now trying various ways to ensure it gets there.  I ask for your help.  Especially for the younger among you, any action you take now will be far more worthwhile for you than me… you're going to live with whatever crime and corruption exists for decades longer than I will.  Already, the press is showing us millions upon millions of dollars lost and I’d think that’s grossly understated.  How much are people willing to pay long-term, say, over your life-time.  How much to you want to put up with?

Note:  Events experienced by me were well underway before related CBC reports aired on The National.  Finally, this isn’t some mis-timed April 1 joke;  I've never been more serious.

*************************************************

Cover Letter

This package relates to organized crime - mainly in Alberta and Ontario - and deals with a subset of a larger collection of events I‘ve found myself involved in from early July to November of this year.  My purpose is to make these often-incredible events known and to request that they be investigated.
N.B.:  The reader may find portions of this brief simply unbelievable, at least at first.  It’s also complex, snowballed as things progressed and while it’s incomplete because I felt that there’s just too much to deal with in a ‘first look’, it is accurate and unembellished;  I ask that it be taken seriously.
One reason why organized crime isn’t always reported is that it effectively controls access to the police, whether by related answering services, providing incorrect numbers or rerouting calls from people with certain knowledge of how ‘they’ work (like me), such that one can never get to the appropriate level for organized crime investigation in a police service.  I've tried contacting the RCMP and elsewhere many times by phone and when asked for the purpose and organized crime is mentioned, I’m blocked for a range of inconsistent ‘reasons’.  If a recipient of this has appropriate contacts in say, the RCMP, CSIS or similar, I ask that you forward this.  Also, please consider the press, politicians, other leaders, etc.
In addition to control of police access, 'they' can control access to flights in a variety of ways including the routing of passengers to gates that are not the correct ones for their intended flight.  And there are variations to this ruse that can apply to hotel accommodation.  If I hadn’t experienced this, I’d find it unbelievable, but it happens.  I’d think the purpose of such traveler rerouting is to allow an organized crime group to isolate those with knowledge or information and coerce them not to divulge anything.
Due to my own experiences dealing with these unsavory criminals, the following pages overview:
- The possibility of risqué photography of minors – as young as 14 – and though less overt than I think would be classed as pornography, images entirely inappropriate for anyone of such an age.
- The inability to report related events and information to the RCMP due either to my phone calls being rerouted to bogus numbers or the corruption of police phone answering services and more, as noted.   
- Information related to the purposeful diverting of travelers from intended flights & other destinations; in my case when I was trying to get to the RCMP in Ottawa in order to provide information dealing with organized crime in Alberta in several diverse areas (and since I began this, also in Ontario).
- Several other areas that due to complexity are only minimally addressed in the communiqué that follows, but that deserve equal attention in my opinion, once some significant investigation starts.
While events began in Alberta, my inability to get to the police here precipitated travel to Ontario and I had analogous but dissimilar experiences there.   Whether many unusual occurrences along the way were designed to unnerve me to the point that my credibility was questioned or whether there was or is something more ominous being attempted is an open question in my view.   The forces behind this are very well financed and I believe these criminals to be a real threat to Canada.   Organized crime can control lives now, but if they aren’t reigned in, they will control many, many more lives into the future; maybe yours, though far more likely just some other law-abiding Canadian.  They need to be stopped.
Thank you for your attention and consideration and hopefully, your interest.

Subject:  Organized Crime in Alberta and Ontario – Personal Experiences from July 2012 to Date

This brief begins with possible risqué photography of underage females but mainly deals with limiting access to the police via phone, or far more complex methods if personal contact attempts are made.

To start, I believe that I ‘fell into’ the situation I am now in.  I’m effectively the statistical equivalent of a lottery winner but otherwise, like most any Canadian.  I’m effectively ‘you’ – in that events could happen to anyone – but I’ve won the reverse of a lottery put on by anonymous criminals.  And due to complexity and a related need for planning of events herein, I doubt I’m even close to the first to experience this;  I’m merely the first I know about.  To me, this is the most important aspect to grasp – any impact of events on me should hardly be considered when they could happen to anyone; whether next year to a reader, a friend or a colleague, or in decades to a daughter, grand-son or stranger.  I hope that the reader keeps this con-text in mind.  Just like what’s emerging in the press about Quebec and now, Ontario, ‘they’ are also in (rich) Alberta and likely the rest of Canada.  And they’ll prey – or try to prey – on anyone.

Possibility of Risqué Photography of Minors and Related Issues

I've become accidentally embroiled in what I believe must be an organized crime group after publicly raising an issue with a Facebook Group about photographers possibly using underage models.  I had connected online with a girl who, by the words she used, wanted very risqué images and even if her words were accidental, another photographer might have taken advantage of them.   By classifying what she was looking for, she had stated what many adult models would avoid as being too risqué and which are entirely inappropriate for any underage girl.  Indeed, she could be completely naked with the term she used.  After discussion and then at my prodding, she eventually stated that she was 14.

The concerns I noted to the Facebook group members failed to raise interest, though I felt – and still feel – that it’s important partly based on the group's size of ~1,000 members and the lack of age data for models, but also due to similarity to at least one previous event that had ostensibly spawned a full police investigation; Officer Matthew MacGregor, Badge 4780, email pol4780@calgarypolice.ca was given as a contact.   When I called the Calgary Police Service and asked for Officer MacGregor, he didn’t seem to be known and I was also told that the Service would not distribute a contact in such a manner.  I now have some doubt about the validity of this information.   Also, nothing had seemed to come from this investigation and when I attempted to confirm this by casually asking about the status from two of those involved, the reaction I received was surprisingly vociferous.   I was told that it was:  “NONE of [my] business” and to “Stop prying”.   To me, the relevance of this information to the group was crystal clear, whether or not I was dealing with a similar scenario.  I still don’t know the outcome but I think it’s noteworthy that the earlier episode also supposedly dealt with an adult male and a 14 year-old female.  The term “prying” because of a simple question to those involved seems inane.  

Almost immediately, there was incredibly offensive activity around me such as harassment and more and I began to think that I’d hit a major nerve even raising this issue, though for the sake of brevity, I'm omitting much of the relevant information in this (first) version of this brief.   The activity noted was far in excess of what one would ever expect to result from the mere questioning of things as per the above.  I can’t overstate this; it seemed that this complex set of objectionable actions were more than just to divert me from asking further questions about group members or related details.  It seemed like gross overkill – or a warning – and I’ve started to wonder just what could quietly occur behind the scenes of a large, benign model/photographer group by, say, nominal members.  And questions even intensify in light of surprising revelations not long ago from a former underage sexual abuse victim.

So with a 14 year-old girl specifying pretty risqué images, what might be a bogus police contact and harassment beyond what could even remotely be expected, I decided to report events to the police. While I first tried the Calgary Police Service as per the Facebook Group’s notes to membership, for a variety of reasons I then elected to try the RCMP.  This began a series of events far more disturbing and unexpected than anything before, the start of things referred to as “unbelievable” on Page 1.  

Attempted Police Contact – Initial Attempts

My attempts to contact the RCMP were thwarted time and time again by those answering my calls.  They simply never put me through to the police proper, no matter the number I called – there were a few – nor how I tried.  Around this time, I saw two CBC National stories that discussed organized crime in Quebec moving into Ontario as reported by Diana Swain.  I began to wonder if organized crime was involved in my situation and was thus operating in Alberta, might they try to restrict reporting of crime by limiting access to police?  Again, as soon as I mentioned organized crime or even pornography as subject matter to the initial phone contact, I was blocked from the police proper, notably of course the police in those areas. This differed even from my call about Officer MacGregor.

I also suggest that if you get put off like I did, or by say, people telling you that this brief is a hoax, get it elsewhere until there’s a known investigation.

Diverting Travelers From Intended Flights and Similar Scenarios – Flying East

With the previous harassment and these issues of contacting police, I decided to fly to Ottawa.  The blocking of my attempts to do this are the main focus of this brief.  I now think that organized crime is firmly entrenched in airport operations, setting up 'false gates' to lure travelers to some location other than their intended flight.  What might happen at said other location isn’t known, but I suspect that at the minimum, the person attempting to get to the police would be warned not to.  In my case trying to go from Calgary to Ottawa, the gate itself was real but staff said that I'd missed my flight.  

The facts were that I arrived at Gate 12 ostensibly for AC 168 on Sep 21 at 6:20 AM and sat as close to the podium as possible, but certainly made myself look like I could be asleep – only opening my eyes briefly to look at activities or in retrospect, lack thereof.  I said nothing when the Boarding Time of 6:40 went by with no activity, nor a couple of other times until I noted that the clock read 6:53, 6:58 and 7:04, approaching the gate podium at 7:10 to ask what was happening.  Of note since I’d never seen this before, no one was actually manning the podium, but came in from the airplane ramp within a minute or so.   Then to my surprise, she fallaciously claimed that everyone had boarded and I had missed the flight and also that they had paged me multiple times.  This was simply not true.  I started to leave and amazingly, a plane actually was towed from the gate at the appropriate time of 7:15, but no passengers had boarded (there had been a 'splitting' of passengers as they approached security and I suspect other passengers actually boarded at a different gate).   I had crossed the gate area to a Starbucks to look for other flights online when one of the podium-based employees hurried across and asked something to the effect of:  "You missed your flight, Sir.  Don't you want us to help you get another?"   I politely declined given that I'd 'missed it' through no fault of my own and now had issues of trust around these people.  Still, she pressed a second time.  With earlier events in mind and as I couldn't successfully board a flight to Ottawa directly, I decided to try and fly east via the States.

Briefly, I went to Denver on Sep 24, then almost immediately to Charlotte, then to JFK in New York, arriving in Toronto on Sep 28.  Incredibly to me, two more diversion ruses occurred during this trip.  After booking online, I went to board AC 8901 to Toronto in the morning of Sep 26 and things became unsettling.  At JFK’s Terminal 7 for Air Canada there was only one temporary ticket counter with a cardboard Air Canada sign and no other travelers despite my normal arrival time.  No real ticket was provided at the check-in counter, though I had a boarding pass and 9 printout pages in lieu of any ticket.  When I tried to get to Gate 12, instead of any normal gate, the sign for Gates 11 & 12 lead halfway down some stairs and another sign pointed left to a narrow (7-8' wide?), short passageway, completely unlike any gate approach.  I just kept walking down and quickly ended in a baggage pick-up area.  Despite no one else going the same way, one of the check-in clerks approached me shortly thereafter to ask if I wasn't taking the flight.  I said I'd pass, but no real employee could even notice, given that the stairway wasn’t visible from the check-in counter, but rather, behind the security check-point and off to the right.  Further, with the passageway to the left being halfway down, she’d have had to be right at the top of the stairs to see.  Finally, no real check-in clerk would leave an active counter and follow a single passenger outside the secure area to ask, even if she could see.  It was a ruse.

I took a later flight with a similar but different Gate 12 approach, arriving at Pearson on Sep 28 where I’m sure another ruse was tried, this time related to hotels.  When I asked about nearby hotel accommodations, Traveler’s Aid repeatedly directed me in no uncertain terms to tell a specific shuttle driver I wanted to go to the Corel Plaza Hotel, which after asking cabbies seems not to exist in the area.  I submit that “Corel Plaza” was a code of sorts to take me elsewhere.  I said above that parts of this might be unbelievable.  For me, these diversion attempts top the list.  But I’ve seen them happen.

Efforts Revisited

I was in Toronto when I started writing and I attempted to get an early draft of this letter to the RCMP, The Globe and Mail, CBC News and elsewhere in early October, with only questionable success.  To reiterate from the cover letter before moving on to possible implications, a number of events related to what’s documented herein were omitted and the issues overviewed above mainly dealt with:
- Points related to a Calgary-based model / photographer Facebook Group, including the possibility of risqué photography of 14 year old females, an alleged recent “full investigation” by police and more.
- Based on my experiences, public corruption of police-related phone services filtering calls when at-tempting to access the police about matters re organized crime (or diversion of my own calls).
- ‘False gates’ being used at YYC and elsewhere, with different M.O.s being used to ensure select passengers do not get on intended flights, again in my case while attempting to access the police.

The people I’ve been forced to deal with at more than arm’s length are in my considered opinion the very worst of humanity - immoral, abject cowards - but they wield enormous power and influence and do not hesitate to use truly unbelievable levels of resources against innocent, targeted Canadians.  

The Future – Aspects in Relation to Inaction
My experiences with this unsavory element of society has made me think of a number of aspects about related events and how they might unfold in the future if there is no significant and effective action taken now.  Two major areas follow; a future version of me – someone with knowledge trying to get to the police – and a quick wider look at societal issues, though both are very speculative.

If nothing is done in relation to organized crime and this brief report, there will almost assuredly be someone trying to do what I’m doing in the future.  But differences will make those attempts even more difficult than mine.  I’m being very detailed in how ‘they’ have tried to curtail my access to the police and I’m sure they’ll ‘do something’ so what I’ve done won’t be so easy.   As I write this – during which hacking attempts increased – it’s clear that ‘they’ want me to fail at getting this information to the correct authorities.  And I’m sure that they’ll effect changes to make it more difficult in general terms for someone else attempting to report organized crime in the future.  

It’s also noteworthy that even in late October, ‘they’ appeared to be using the names of people I know to send malware to me by way of web links and email attachments; or as noted elsewhere this is to unnerve me and have my credibility questioned if any link is benign.  Similarly but worse, it seems that they’ve tried to gain access to my main computer via Bluetooth using my 80-something in-laws’ names and their devices.  They should not even be privy this information, much less be using it in nefarious ways.  They are nothing more than immoral thugs with power and money but no sense of decency, and increasingly it looks like little or no boundaries.  And I submit that as ‘they’ infiltrate society more over time, this unsavory uncovering of personal data and using it against ‘their owners’ will only become easier for them and thus they’ll likely use it more frequently and to far greater effect.

Even the direction of computer technology – and I’m using Apple’s Mac here for an example – will make things more difficult for someone trying to report major crime to the appropriate authorities.  New systems with increased use of Bluetooth will make hacking easier and the full date displayed in the upper right of many of my screen shots is becoming a thing of the past.  Also, I have pretty wide IT experience – computers were a career choice from 1972 to 2006 and I still try to keep abreast of technology.  This would likely give me a leg up on a future victim with less experience.  While I can’t know if I’ll be successful in raising sufficient interest to make headway against organized crime by what’s documented herein, I’m pretty sure I’m better positioned than many future ‘targets’ would be.

Further, I had both the time and enough resources to sometimes stay ahead of criminal hacking.  I could decide to fly to Denver and elsewhere at a moment’s notice, ‘miss’ paid-for flights by just not boarding when I felt the situation warranted that and in the 2 or so weeks (Sept 21 - Oct 6) that I was traveling, I purchased a MacBook Pro 15, 2 iPads (the first was stolen), a netbook and a Samsung Galaxy S III smart phone, all to try and allow myself continued net access in light of criminal hacking of my equipment.  Without doing so, I could not have continued to make the quick changes to my itinerary necessary to progress, nor in retrospect, to gather experience and the hopefully acceptable evidence of the related screen shots.  Finally with regard to this happening to someone in the future and (s)he trying to report it, while I didn’t get to the correct authorities on my trip back east, I did make contact with an ex-cop (his term) and I’m using useful information that he provided this time.

Another aspect is what will happen to our society if organized crime continues to control more and more.  While I’m no expert, I can speculate.   The influence ‘they’ have now is mind-boggling – please see next section – but it will never be reduced unless by force and legal action.   As is known, one way organized crime can obtain success in the business world is to use illegally gained money to under-bid valid competitors, which if done consistently can force (legal) competition out of the market and eventually raise prices, such as the Quebec Corruption Inquiry is looking at.  This will continue and will also make it increasingly difficult for targeted individuals to do anything to report the situation.  

As a related aside, with the increase in Americans losing their homes and organized crime’s covert influence, I’ve even questioned whether that could be a future scenario in Canada if nothing is done.

Final Words…

Whether web access, credit card acceptance for specific purchases, hacking and/or theft of people’s personal smart electronics, associated influence at certain technology-related retail outlets, control of some commercial services such as computer access and printing, personal tracking and harassment using numerous resources, infiltration of forums as mods and admins to monitor / control information, control of cellular access and even use of portions of our Health Care systems;  the criminal element can and do use these to inhibit people they know are trying to get relevant information to the police.  I even have some reason to question whether a church forum website I use has been targeted.

And almost anyone could be ensnared for reasons as diverse as this or identity theft – again, I’m not unique though my situation may be unusual.  They win, though they aren’t winners; while we lose, though we’re not the losers here.  For our own good, we need to level the playing field and do so quickly.  I’m still trying to get this to the right people but have no real way to detect / avoid any current corruption that might try to inhibit me.  Hence, redistribution of this will help and will be appreciated.

I also have no way to know whether ‘they’ have actually infiltrated these organizations or have just corrupted front line staff – I suspect both – but I humbly submit that if it’s not too late already, we are losing our country, as least as we think we know it.  Canada is being taken over by organized crime and we’ll continue to lose because of that... for generations.  I have more information on every point noted above, only a small amount of that on the graphics mentioned below – still being developed.

I request this brief be taken seriously at least to the point of contacting me for further information and hopefully afterward so action results to curtail these criminals.  Thank you in advance for your time.

Sincerely, G. Brett Aubrey

Share this

Comments

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

A far, far better formatted and easier to read version here:

 

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/corruption-in-alberta-ca...

 

...including a reference to this wondrous place I visit now and then :-).

 

Edit:  Interesting to me at least...  when I posted the above mess, I came back to edit within what I thought was 5 - maybe 10 - minutes and it seemed that the 'Edit' function was no longer displayed.  But by my clock it's been an hour since posting this and I can still edit.  Go figure.  Could be user error, though - I just don't know how I'd have missed it.

chemgal's picture

chemgal

image

BrettA wrote:

 

Edit:  Interesting to me at least...  when I posted the above mess, I came back to edit within what I thought was 5 - maybe 10 - minutes and it seemed that the 'Edit' function was no longer displayed.  But by my clock it's been an hour since posting this and I can still edit.  Go figure.  Could be user error, though - I just don't know how I'd have missed it.

Or it could be that you can't edit after a post has been quoted, replied to, or the original post.  :)

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

Well good...  that means it wasn't user error on missing it :-)!  Thanks!

chemgal's picture

chemgal

image

I'm confused as to what started off the whole thing.  What exactly is a monster house?

 

Also, how did you know there was a link to organized crime?  It wouldn't surprise me if kiddie porn and organized crime in Alberta are linked, but someone asking for risque photos (doubt it was an actual 14 year old saying that) doesn't immediately make me think organized crime.

InannaWhimsey's picture

InannaWhimsey

image

Holy (flibber)tgibbets -- be careful, BrettA

ab penny's picture

ab penny

image

Holy crap, I'm not reading that whole thing, BrettA.  I'm from Alberta, so I'm interested...can you give me a recap?

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

ab penny wrote:

Holy crap, I'm not reading that whole thing, BrettA.  I'm from Alberta, so I'm interested...can you give me a recap?

We're talking about 6 months of activity, fairly intense activity since about Sep 2, so no, nort realistically in the timeframe I'm got since the activity is ongoing.  Hopefully sometime and if you missed the link above...

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/corruption-in-alberta-ca...

 

There's been a significant update and I tried to be brief.  But when I literally cannot get hold  of the RCMP and CSIS by phone (i.e. can't get past the phone answerers), there's a problem.  Especially when I raise the possibility of underage risque photography and more.  It's my expectation that phone calls are being intercepted/rerouted.

 

Also, here are some graphics I'm working on - 12 so far - in case you find them easier:

 

http://www.intersiteimaging.com/Kodachrome/Corr12/

Azdgari's picture

Azdgari

image

I found Acetone's reply to be a reasonable one on the rationalskepticism forum to which you posted this story:

Acetone wrote:
So you went from a supposed 14 year old girl wanting nude photographs taken of her to organized crime to organized crime in the national police/investigative forces of Canada to Pearson int'l was able to single you out and send you to a false gate and I feel like you're questioning members here being involved in Canadian organized criminal activity by suggesting that we're unfairly questioning and criticizing your post?? Are you SURE this isn't an untimely April fools joke? Ridiculous beyond belief.

Pearson int'l does not have false gates that it sends people to who will definitely not be getting on planes/leaving the airport. I asked my friend, he's a manager of security there.

What could have happened on facebook was you came upon an undercover police officer who is attempting to 'catch predators'. They go onto internet groups and present criminal opportunities to people and, well, whoever bites is screwed (not the way they want to be). You reported it, as you should, and that's where your involvement should stop. Why do you need to be informed of the progress of the investigation and how does it blow up to organized crime and plots to stop you?

I think it's very telling that the media won't pick up your story. Not of organized criminal involvement in the media, but because your claims are ridiculous.

I think this thread should be moved into a conspiracy theory area of the forum. It does not belong in News/Current Affairs/Politics.

 

Bolds mine.  Rather than address his points, you blew him off.

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

Azdgari wrote:

I found Acetone's reply to be a reasonable one on the rationalskepticism forum to which you posted this story:

Acetone wrote:
...beyond belief.

What could have happened on facebook was you came upon an undercover police officer who is attempting to 'catch predators'. They go onto internet groups and present criminal opportunities to people and, well, whoever bites is screwed (not the way they want to be). You reported it, as you should, and that's where your involvement should stop. Why do you need to be informed of the progress of the investigation and how does it blow up to organized crime and plots to stop you?

 

Bolds mine.  Rather than address his points, you blew him off.

Au contraire - I agreed with him or more correctly, he agreed with me and I confirmed agreement.  I'll try to let the authories determine what happened, rather than what could have happened.

Azdgari's picture

Azdgari

image

Ahh.  I misinterpreted sarcasm into your reply to him.  Apologies.

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

BrettA -- your consipracy theories would indicate to me you might consult someone for help.

 

I read your conspiracy images regarding wondercafe and being blocked.  You need some help.

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.  G'night ( your turn, Az :-) ).

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

BrettA wrote:

ab penny wrote:

Holy crap, I'm not reading that whole thing, BrettA.  I'm from Alberta, so I'm interested...can you give me a recap?

...  But when I literally cannot get hold  of the RCMP and CSIS by phone (i.e. can't get past the phone answerers), there's a problem.  Especially when I raise the possibility of underage risque photography and more.  

Well. this is a good sign as I finally did make contact with the RCMP today and while things didn't progress as perfectly as I'd wanted, a start's a start :-).

 

So did any of that help, AB P?

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

A new development is that meds usually prescribed by my GP - Dr. Jane Ballantine (Warfarin) - and cardiologist - Dr. Paul Pollak (Amiodarone, Coversill Plus) - were last prescribed to me under the name "D. Madan, S" ostensibly on Oct. 29.  

 

I've known Jane for decades before being a patient and I very much like Dr. Pollak and hope that they too are not having experiences akin to mine by criminals or by this Dr. Madan, S (someone I had a total of ~15 minutes with at the Rockyview General Hospital).  Curiouser and curiouser.

Pinga's picture

Pinga

image

right, coz, everyone is after you BrettA.

 

Truly, your paranoia is out of control.  Please contact your local medical resources for a psychiatric eval and/or medicine adjustment.

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi BrettA,

 

BrettA wrote:

A new development is that meds usually prescribed by my GP - Dr. Jane Ballantine (Warfarin) - and cardiologist - Dr. Paul Pollak (Amiodarone, Coversill Plus) - were last prescribed to me under the name "D. Madan, S" ostensibly on Oct. 29.  

 

Was this a prescription refil or renewal?

 

Pharmacies here in Ontario will repeat the name of the Doctor who issued the initial prescription on subsequent refils.  My son has run out of prescription refills while his regular physician is on vacation and the Doctor on call will consult with the pharmacist and renew the prescription, the renewal will bear the name of the Doctor on call and there will be no refills authorized unless my son's physician will be away longer than the prescription the on call physicial issues the prescription for.

 

If you did not see this new Doctor who issued the prescription then you should contact your physicians immediately to confirm.

 

It may not be a conspiracy.

 

It could be a serious mix-up at the pharmacy which would be no less alarming.

 

BrettA wrote:

(someone I had a total of ~15 minutes with at the Rockyview General Hospital).  Curiouser and curiouser.

 

So you did have contact with the Dr whose name is on your prescription.  What was the nature of that contact?

 

Grace and peace to you

John

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

Given that I now see my original post has been 'played with' - though I don't know by how much (possibly just formatting) - I think I'll pass on anything else.  As I've stated on other forums, my main purpose was to get information about a complex set of events 'out there'.  I'll continue to do that if this thread isn't deleted again.

InannaWhimsey's picture

InannaWhimsey

image

BrettA wrote:

Given that I now see my original post has been 'played with' - though I don't know by how much (possibly just formatting) - I think I'll pass on anything else.  As I've stated on other forums, my main purpose was to get information about a complex set of events 'out there'.  I'll continue to do that if this thread isn't deleted again.

 

*giggle*  maybe you need to get out more? :3

 

and watch out for those coincidences and synchronicities...they can be killers :3

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi BrettA,

 

BrettA wrote:

Given that I now see my original post has been 'played with' - though I don't know by how much (possibly just formatting) - I think I'll pass on anything else.

 

You don't know if anything other than formatting has been changed?

 

What kind of irresponsibility is this?

 

If you cannot be bothered to check and confirm then why should we be expected to swallow this conspiracy blindly?

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

revjohn wrote:

Hi BrettA,

 

BrettA wrote:

Given that I now see my original post has been 'played with' - though I don't know by how much (possibly just formatting) - I think I'll pass on anything else.

You don't know if anything other than formatting has been changed? 

What kind of irresponsibility is this?

No irresponsibility at all, since I know software well enough after working in IT basically since '72 and also having seen textual changes (rather than formatting changes) elsewhere, that whether it's the same when I look or different when i look, those people that reformatted this can change it again at will anyway.  Thus any look is merely a point-in-time assessement and effectively useless.

 

So thanks for the at least implicit ackowledgement that yes, the very obvious changes made to my supposedly uneditable original post were actually made by someone.

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi BrettA,

 

BrettA wrote:

Thus any look is merely a point-in-time assessement and effectively useless.

 

That being the case your claim is effectively useless.

 

BrettA wrote:

So thanks for the at least implicit ackowledgement that yes, the very obvious changes made to my original and supposedly uneditable post were actually made by someone.

 

I've acknowledged nothing save the fact you have made a claim without evidence to support your claim.

 

When pressed you resort to the suggestion that changes can be made at will rendering it impossible for you to provide evidence of any kind.

 

You now claim that the OP is supposedly uneditable without providing proof that editting has happened.

 

Pretty convenient for your story.  Make a wild claim, and when questions are raised questioning your claim double down on the wild accusations and claim that the evidence has been tampered with.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

InannaWhimsey's picture

InannaWhimsey

image

folks,

 

i wouldn't be surprised if this were another of BrettA's experiments to see how people here react to evidential claims...ending up going "so, since you reacted to my claims in such and such a way, why do you react in such and such a way to religious claims?"

 

carry on, sentients...

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi InannaWhimsey,

 

InannaWhimsey wrote:

i wouldn't be surprised if this were another of BrettA's experiments to see how people here react to evidential claims...ending up going "so, since you reacted to my claims in such and such a way, why do you react in such and such a way to religious claims?"

 

Possibly.

 

I think it somewhat remote though.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

revjohn wrote:

Hi BrettA,

 

BrettA wrote:

Thus any look is merely a point-in-time assessement and effectively useless.

 

That being the case your claim is effectively useless.

I disagree - the cases aren't connected - but why do you even care enough to even comment?

BrettA wrote:

 

revjohn wrote:

 

So thanks for the at least implicit ackowledgement that yes, the very obvious changes made to my original and supposedly uneditable post were actually made by someone.

 

I've acknowledged nothing save the fact you have made a claim without evidence to support your claim.

 

When pressed you resort to the suggestion that changes can be made at will rendering it impossible for you to provide evidence of any kind.

 

You now claim that the OP is supposedly uneditable without providing proof that editting has happened.

 

Pretty convenient for your story.  Make a wild claim, and when questions are raised questioning your claim double down on the wild accusations and claim that the evidence has been tampered with.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

Yeah, I just did all this because I had nothing else to do this year ;-).

BrettA's picture

BrettA

image

 

InannaWhimsey wrote:

folks,

 

i wouldn't be surprised if this were another of BrettA's experiments to see how people here react to evidential claims...ending up going "so, since you reacted to my claims in such and such a way, why do you react in such and such a way to religious claims?"

 

carry on, sentients...

I'm not clear where this one's even coming from - could you provide a few examples of what you consider my "experiments" (there aren't any, from my POV)?

 

I'll also note that Rev John's seemingly illogical "That being the case your claim is effectively useless." seems more in line with your "so, since you reacted to my claims in such and such a way..." than anything I've said, but hopefully one of the examples of my supposed 'experiments' will have something like this so I can see where you're coming from.

 

Really, all I'm trying to do is the best I can to report a set of criminal activities (or what should be criminal) and hopefully have them investigated.  Again, I don't care a whole bunch what people here think... I know I'm being accurate and factual.  There's no "convenient to my story..." and what makes the 'claims' wild is that the events were.

 

BTW, the word "claims" just isn't right from my POV unless if you use that word in such contexts that after, say, going  to buy milk and telling someone you went to buy milk, you consider that a 'claim' made to that someone.  I wouldn't.

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi BrettA,

 

BrettA wrote:

I disagree - the cases aren't connected - but why do you even care enough to even comment?

 

The suggestion that editors have changed your content rather than your format leads to the conclusion that the editors are hiding something rather than enabling others to access your material more easily.

 

Are they helping or are they hindering?

 

As to why I care there are a number of reasons it may be one singular or all of them combined. 

 

First, the allegation attacks the integrity of WonderCafe.ca if the changes go beyond mere format to actual content.  Second, the allegation attacks the integrity of the administration staff if the changes go beyond mere format to actual content.  Third, given the accusations made in the OP and the rapidly growing consensus that you are unwell any opportunity afforded to you to prove or even clarify your claims either affirms or allays our mounting concerns. Finally, other than you being unwell it has been suggested that this is actually an elaborate ruse on your part and if that is proven to be true then there are few here who would ever trust you in the future and would be less likely to trust anyone else associated with WonderCafe.ca.

 

Have at it.

 

BrettA wrote:

Yeah, I just did all this because I had nothing else to do this year ;-).

 

My comments were related to the bounds of the allegation that the OP has been changed without any evidence from you as to the nature of the change.  My aoplogies to you if that was not clear.

 

As to everything else you have reported, I like many others, am somewhat skeptical.  That skepticism is not helped by alleging that the format of your OP has been changed and your refusal to illustrate how.

 

I have seen Admin clean up an OP on request.  I do not know that they would do so without a request from the author of the OP.  If all that has changed of the OP is the format then possibly the original format was causing problems for Admin.

 

If all that has changed is the format and all of the content is untouched then I fail to see what the issue actually is.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

qwerty's picture

qwerty

image

I see there is some issue about censorship or editing of Brett's original post.  Whoever added all those extra words and digressions into Brett's original, I assume, very succinct post ought to be horsewhipped for being so pompous as to expect that anyone would take the time to read it.  The perpetrator of this "crime" ought to be tracked down and punished.  No effort should be spared to assure that we are never again burdened by such an avalanche of blather.

Back to Politics topics
cafe