John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

Arminology, Explained!

Reality as best we can know it...both hard and easy to understand...

Share this

Comments

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

It is as simple as it is complex:

What Arm has so often tried to describe his 'awarenesss moment' in a cadence

of description...and refers correctly to it's mystical 'taint'...is being propounded by Quantum physicists as the closest humans can percieve --mathemarically !-- reality and can be stated in a simple statement which is also profound:

Everything is connected.

or, if you wish:

We are all in this together.

 

 

 

 

 

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

Which I think is a perception Jesus had...which is WHY we should love our neighbors as ourself.

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

...and Mohammund wrote "We are all equal" ...

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

Arm: You're a Quantum physicist...without having to take the exam! 

GeoFee's picture

GeoFee

image

Thanks for priming the pump John Wilson....

 

There are two kinds of stars. The most familiar to us radiate energy, brightening and warming. Our planet lives in close relation with such a star.

 

The less familiar consume energy, drawing by tremendous gravity all entering the circumference of their influence.

 

Human being radiates from within to illuminate the world without. This continues even when the first step of autonomy begins the journey of estrangement. That journey leads through the land of opportunity and temptation. The singular soul chooses opportunity, taking up disciplines required for realization of the manifold possible.

 

The multitude prefer the easy way of temptation, a preference for the ten thousand distractions over responsible presence. For every appetite there are two advertisers ready with promise and product available for sale at a bargain price.

 

We are constantly reminded of ills and pains, dissatisfactions and disappointments, and promised remedy for sale. Feeling blue? How about a new car to perk you up? It is the best car ever. It will make you powerful and sexy. Nothing down and very easy payments. Just sign here.

 

We who journey to the heart of unity in love are blessed and bring blessing. We celebrate the overturning of the divider's tyrannies though those tyrannies prevail and increase. We are not cast down and we do not bow down. This is the adventure of our ordinary being, expressed as openness to the creative freedom of love in action.

 

Thinking of Enoch - who walked with God and was not.

 

George

 

 

Neo's picture

Neo

image

Good post GeoFee. And John, Arm is not the only one having cosmic vision. People all over the world, from every walk of life are beginning to awaken to the God within.


Ponder on the following, there is wisdom here:


The Laws of Life wrote:
Saith the Great Law: ʺIn order to become the KNOWER of ALL SELF thou hast first of SELF to be the knower.ʺ To reach the knowledge of that SELF, thou hast to give up Self to Non‐ Self, Being to Non‐Being, and then thou canst repose between the wings of the GREAT BIRD. Aye, sweet is rest between the wings of that which is not born, nor dies, but is the AUM throughout eternal ages.

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

[quote=Neo]Good post GeoFee. And John, Arm is not the only one having cosmic vision.

 

[quote]

Terue and I did not mean to so imply. He was, here, I believe, the first and here, the most notible. I agree with

People all over the world, from every walk of life are beginning to awaken to the God within.

I think its being going on for quite a while (of not millinia) 

 

thou hast to give up Self to Non‐ Self, Being to Non‐Being, and then thou canst repose between the wings of the GREAT BIRD.

In my (off hand) opinion, far too many words screaming for definition agreed upon...

I'll take 'love thy neighbor as thyself.'

Not into arguing though...

Friendly thoughts..

Neo's picture

Neo

image

John Wilson wrote:

thou hast to give up Self to Non‐ Self, Being to Non‐Being, and then thou canst repose between the wings of the GREAT BIRD.

In my (off hand) opinion, far too many words screaming for definition agreed upon...

I'll take 'love thy neighbor as thyself.'

Not into arguing though...

Friendly thoughts..


Agreed, one could probably write a whole book on that one paragraph. I read the "repose between the wings", for instance, as like the "straight and narrow way" that Jesus spoke of.


Cheers my friend.

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

Curios thing banter, it is sort of like good natured aguing but some people know this not ... battling your way into another's thinking space that is really common; like mêmè-çi? But first one has to know a lot of word ... some John said it was a god meant for intercourse while in the bantering mode. Sort of metaphorical, or devilish, as satyr to figure out ... a fugue Ur? Just a blast of well warmed wind from that light at the end of the cave/tun'eL? Did you know most light is abstract ... not observable as dark ... one should use great care around the unseen ID's!

 

Is the human a curious entity to be congnizant of? Some even hate curiosities and wish to put them down. Now if you took this to the limit ... would that be one strange man standing there proud of himself for winning? Last emon syndrome; but yah have to know what an emon was over time. Is it like an emmote that bugs you on the page and you won't look into it? Pure allegorical Cos of curiosity; this we lost ... like thoughts ... lost souls (if the psyche is the thinking contraption that follows a'mon about)? It is something the book of emotions (love?) tells us we shouldn't know or we would be aware of it coming at yah ... you only see it going ... after the incident that will lead to some banter or intercourse of some type ... physical or metaphysical? That's spooky to some that you would consider thinking that way ... avoids knowing nothing or nut'n ... a mind-blown incident ... ruagh humis for those that don't go that way ... and prefer to be innocent of what a' man can do ... leaves holes and holei stuff everwhere he goes if not thoughtful ... why the symbol of love is a heart shot full of Eros ... anachronism ... takes time to heal in reflection (an/na) of the misuse of a soul piece ... bottom line on fear and thought when stood up ET'icallah ... causing Joey about digging up the Cos of the curiosity ... that someone called soul, as the mind is a very strange thing. When studying it people think your strang ... word-dissociation prototype? There is a postive test called word association ... allows for bottom-line connections (subtle) or mental intercourse!

 

Would that be a hero god or just another alein deis mon ... a singularity of sorts.

 

If aliens cannot be defeated they should be confused ---GOD! Thus it was ... done in a stoic way as the heavenly hosts were cast down as Levites ... a form of light humis, or OEM's ... Gamma Lil's? Something to look into with roots that are dark ... like dream land!

 

When de mudder of God OEM's you know you're in trouble ... some say it is the end when Gabriel hums, after messing arround with one man's leg ... done pulled like pork!

 

So many curious things, so little time ... an almost ridiculous enigma unless there's another side to emotional chaos ... intellectual chaos? Is there a medium to process this? Get out of here, go figure ... you know IT's out there ... a fabric to filter this through as a vale or dell, sometimes a glen, or a pipe ... many think the pipe a honking sad thing ... like a crippled Duke, bit off or Daffy looking down at things like a condor or a rapture on high ... curios as to what will bring it down! Offal? did you know "aL" is something overhead ... suggesting the sublimative nature of thoughts from mortal heights? Something to connect severed or lost souls why they talk after sects if they understand ...the Lucen'd nature of silent intecourse as a time when things go silent ... for a bit , or chit!

 

Then who today cares about  gentile sects ... we all think we're powerful ... and we're not due to Luce'n it ... thus Ben terre ... young earth syndrome to amuse those things locked away in space until everything figures the curiosity out. When you are cognizant of this you have a change and thus become quantuum ... flighty or fey OBI"s that may be obtuse to those not completly sure ... the NDE, or "end" if you look at it all ways ... it could start something ...

 

Monotheists never look at things the way the other does ... leaves us all about people sort of shunned ... ot-there as fringe or horizon people dusk to don ... as short of shady dirt under a tree ...

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

WB:

Pardon?

InannaWhimsey's picture

InannaWhimsey

image

ALL HAIL THE ONE TRUE G_D. CREATOR OF E'ERYTHING, LORAX-LIKE, THE ALL-IN-ONE, ALL-CONNECTED-ONE

 

LET US MEDITATE UPON YOUR FECUND AND SEDUCTIVE FORM

 

 

 

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

IW ...

Call me the minus 1 thingy ...

 

John believes I'm out of here ... but then if intelligence is beyond the body and wiles according to Webster; guess where this po'sol'is lost ... in heis thoughts?

 

Then if God is the word should we understand strange ramblings beta ?

 

Gotta L'uv strange equations relating to imaginary equity betwee emotions and intellect ... a balanced alien thing ... like the mind? Most you find are not balanced ... thus the fallout! Or is that just tumbling ferilizer of Taurus, Arminious?

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Where is Arm to explain his 'ology'? Haven't seen him post in a few weeks.

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Anyone heard from Arminius? Was also thinking about Neo.

John Wilson's picture

John Wilson

image

WaterBuoy wrote:

 

 

Is the human a curious entity to be congnizant of?

 

A double yep.

 

You start with you Then mega entangelment with biocentrism and string theory tossed in

just to keep this universe interesting. This one's for you, WB. Collapse them

waves! Roll them there dice! ....Many universes,,,,hmmm

I like the one Spong has,

 

Then again there's Thomas a' Kempis...

 

...and Credo Dollar. 

 

and mine.

Some even hate curiosities and wish to put them down.

Cat killer. Even Schrodinger's had a 50% chance,

Now if you took this to the limit ..

Ah, the limit = set, in this incident by WB.

WaterBuoy wrote:

. would that be one strange man standing there proud of himself for winning?

 

What does that bear on curiosity, which comes in a thousand flavors...

Some have absolutely no curiosity about my opinions...but yes, I am a man standing here, proud of myself for winning -- often. To you strange, to me normal.

 

the mind is a very strange thing.

 

Perhaps as biocentrism postulates, the mind is the only thing. every thing is a creation of yours as them durn waves surrender and collapse...

 

people think you're 

strange ...

You make that sound like a Bad thing.

 

We ripe and ripe

and rot and rot

and thereby hangs a tale

 

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

An "O" with hook hanging (g) meat hook for the lamb? (sometimes appears as ioj, or I-owed-jah and thus off to work we go in alien space, under dah trees; that's no white cartoon) Like someone gathering light and not sharing; Eros a' Charon is not how it appears physically ... sort of latent metaphysicality? Then like quo vadis we jump into the quo*n*Ðumb ... the pits of the universe---Einstein, but it is said he was dis*lexic ... saw things another way Tu ... be very cautious how you share thoughts about Oz (power) to people of embellished emotions ... sort of like Judi'n or Juli'n myths about aggression leading to more loss than gain in the Utilitarian sense of paradigm ... that's eM! But who gives a chit about eM in a world of vanities (va nite; a travelling night)? Thus hades goes, searching for something useless to burn, like tares?

 

Ever watch TED.com John? Intersting stuff if you follow the series called WORDS, WORDS, WORDS; linguistic entanglement that attempts to unwind weird linge ... as explicit thought ... and much religion is against thought, thinking or other psyche process about mortal desires to conquer everything under the heavens ... and alas here we are in the runes and rubble of destruction of Classic Thought; the chimerii, or golden law ... such things could go against mortal god(s) ... I'll go for the stretch; what the Egyptians called ankh in myth ... thus Toem Hanks in Cloud Atlas ... a weird presentation of flashbacks or timely reflections! Something for us to gather something from in adequate season---Ecclesiastes? some believe thegathering of intelligence is the pits like upsilon defines de Nus ... an upset of great de light in Greek Capital ... Olé thing that few grasp!

 

Is word like god but not something to be worshipped ... only a scion of greater things? This is beyond the stoic in a myth, causing some myrrh*th' to those that can see thro' IT to exceptions ... of the hard roué a'L! Something to be seen beyond the norm ... like's hades in the wilderness ... convoluted or inverse thing*heh! Stirs the near dead sol' ... like appropriate NDE's ... as you see eM going ...

 

Wittgenstein; "a man limited in vocabulary limits his perspective" (or something like that you'd expect from a witch*gyn*stein that haunts yah, especially after the physical portion departs). All that remains are thoughts ... interesting probable consequences ... like LazìAris in phonetic spectre ... chi rests until inflamed ... gave Karl Marx de chivas ...

 

How big is god(s) vocabulary? That's indefinite right now and still expanding as a complexity to affect the "i" ... an internalized entity sort of convoluted in alien dimensions ... so those that don't wish to don't halve to gnoe ... so beit the hook ... phish-ease ... mire chit to emotional sorts ...

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

John,

Just for you and a few others that would like to know more about the extended dimension of the cussed (Cos Et'd?) soul ... something denied by those that like to travel on emotions alone ... when they throw the baggage overboard in flight ... what's left---Jonah ... that could be mispelt as a slip of the hand from J'h'n as god palmed off thoughts from his darker side ... in Greek this is like "T" or upsilon and the whole thing was upset ... so the emotions would appear under fete from the intellectual side. Isn't that out there? There is some concern over the soul where upstairs or down, in or oude, left or write! Go phig Ur ...

 

The Dimension of Thought and Word …

In this area that mortal would sooner avoid … for what’s more dangerous than a thinker in off-setting the aboriginal sin; that of the rapturous mind filled only with emotions to put down what surrounds th’M.

From the realm of TED. Com .. several presentations on the nature of complexity in word and thought. As Wittgenstein wrote: “The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” Sadly this may put us beyond our neighbours and they’ll think your out there … and they despise anything they can’t control like  … stretch of mind … ankh? Do people learn anything from the pain of absence? Some say curiosity is the greatest power of all; trying to learn about abstracts … what isn’t said! Archeology is usful when getting to dig sol'.

As Satchmo said: "if you don't know perhaps you got none!"

 Sets the flighty thing under fete/soul all a flutter as in quo'n Ðumb and the beta is silent as the busty scion ... ß ... eve'n with L'uv ... maintaining balance!

These talks are all under TED.com and you can search for them under the presenter’s name as:

o       Terry Moore; Why is X the unknown?

o       John McWhorter; Texting is Killing Language.

o       Steven Pinker; On Language and Thoughts.

o       Mark Pagel: How Language Transformer Humanity.

o       Erin McKean: Redefining the Dictionary.

o       Alan Siegel: Let’s Simplify Legal Jargon (then perhaps common folk will stop playing with satyrs).

o       Wade Davis: On Endangered Cultures (does anyone care about the neighbour)?

o       Patricia Ryan: Ideas in all Languages, Not Just English!

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

What? A thread on Arminology?

 

First off, Arminology is not to Armianianism. Arminianism is a branch of Calvinism, whereas Arminology is the philosophy of yours truly.

 

Actually, Arminology is not a philosophy. It is an anti-philosophy, designed to put an end to all philosophies and all philosophising.

 

Arminology is pure creativeness. It is playing an actively creative part in an actively creative universe. It is being the creative universe engaged in dynamically creative action.

 

According to Arminology, the only thing there is is the singularity called creative energy. Just eternal, creative, transformative or transcendental energy. That's all there is, and that's what we are. No mystery!

 

With its transcendental or transformative power, however, creative energy is limitlessly and constantly creative. Because the process of cosmic creation is a wholistic, syncretic or synergetic process, the process and its outcomes can't always be figured out analytically—at least not with absolute truthfulness—and that's why it is a mystery in analytical terms. With the force of its transcendental power, creative energy has transformed ITself into an wide variety of states and forms while remaining what it always is, was, and will be: an eternal singularity of transcendental energy, a.k.a. God.

 

We, the totality of being, are God continuously transcending and transforming ITself while remaining God. We are God observing and contemplating ITself. We are God continuously creating, re-creating and re-inventing ITself. We are God continuously, consciously, and intentionally evolving and co-evolving  ITself toward ever higher forms. We are co-creators and co-evolvers in God's continuous and sacred game of cosmic evolution or creation.

 

This is Arminology in a nutshell. (The shell of a cosmic nut :-)

 

 

 

Kimmio's picture

Kimmio

image

Good to see the man himself here to explain his 'ology'! :) Welcome back, Arm!

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

Arminianism is a branch of Calvinism,

 

AAAAGH!

 

Arminianism is not a branch of Calvinism.  It is a reaction against Calvinism.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

"Arminianism is not a branch of Calvinism.  It is a reaction against Calvinism."?

 

And so the Dan's begun ... is beginning? The detailing of light odds or just godds (gamma-oddities of thinking; mental commodities for short) when transmutated from Greek an Olé tongue to the Roman ... perhaps just trans end en tals during the dissociative function of words compiled through time ... to hide the source ... thus the berry'd chimerii entity!

 

The Weslyan Church I was raised in shunned people who investigated sacred knowledge as a rule of hieros gammos ... thus I am eliminated by "character" ... like icons (iconophobia; iconoclast) of old thought as projected in script ... pœm isisole isn't that word disambiguated ... if you can deal with hermeunetics ... the science of following ath aught? Then the enigma of putting it back together adequately for Utilitarian Philosophy (the love of wisdom of assisting self and the other self, mire image of that which isn't ...) something that isn't well ... known here ... as many religions defy thought ... you got to admit thought is a daemonish thing that relates to the modern form of deiz, or diurnal things ... that which goes round!

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

revjohn wrote:

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

Arminianism is a branch of Calvinism,

 

AAAAGH!

 

Arminianism is not a branch of Calvinism.  It is a reaction against Calvinism.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

 

Yes, so it is. Sorry.

 

Calling Arminianism a branch of Calvinism is like calling Protestantism a branch of Catholicism, eh?smiley

 

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

More on Arminology:

 

I think transcendental energy was (is) originally unquantified. This means it had no measurable quantity, but it had the quality to transcend its unquantified state and quantify itself, which it did, outwardly and inversely, along the familiar quantum leaps of doubling/halving of quantum with each leap, thereby creating not only quantified energy but also inverse/outward space and reverse/forward time. IT then ripped all or part of its orderly quantification into chaos. The rest is history.

 

Throughout this process, energy remained what it always was, is, and will be: a singularity of transcendental energy, a.k.a. God. This is our absolute Truth and our ultimate Self.

 

I experienced all of this in a mind blowing vision on the eve of the Vernal Equinox of 1984. I subsequently interpreted this vision according to scientific cosmology. Had I lived at an earlier age, I would have interpreted my vision according to the cosmology that prevailed then. But, in our day and age, scientific cosmology seemed the most accurate way to interpret my vision. Moreover, I actually saw—and was (and am!)—the quantification of bubbles of light as outlined in Quantum Theory.

 

In Cosmic Unity,

 

Arminius

 

revjohn's picture

revjohn

image

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

Calling Arminianism a branch of Calvinism is like calling Protestantism a branch of Catholicism, eh?smiley

 

Ummmm not quite.

 

Catholicism means Christian.  So Catholicism has three main branches, Orthodox, Roman and Protestant.  Therefore Protestants are Catholic.

 

The distinction I think you want is Roman Catholic.  

 

Calling Arminianism a branch of Calvinism is like calling Protestantism a branch of Roman Catholicism.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

WaterBuoy's picture

WaterBuoy

image

And small "c" catholicism is considered a universal thing leaving all sects in chaos ... which is almost like being delighted to have received some mysterious power.

 

Even dependable observers of energy say that it is indeterminate, you just never know when an enlightened thought will po'pup as scattered dogmas' ... shyir fundis, or fecundity in another tradition! A whack on the nose is good for direction of any num anima ... nos-hyte ...

Arminius's picture

Arminius

image

revjohn wrote:

Hi Arminius,

 

Arminius wrote:

Calling Arminianism a branch of Calvinism is like calling Protestantism a branch of Catholicism, eh?smiley

 

Ummmm not quite.

 

Catholicism means Christian.  So Catholicism has three main branches, Orthodox, Roman and Protestant.  Therefore Protestants are Catholic.

 

The distinction I think you want is Roman Catholic.  

 

Calling Arminianism a branch of Calvinism is like calling Protestantism a branch of Roman Catholicism.

 

Grace and peace to you.

John

 

Yes, John, I meant Roman Catholicism.

Back to Religion and Faith topics