Copied from Alternet.Org
The Latest Creepy Step From Facebook: Facial Recognition Technology
June 15, 2011 - Remember the uproar when Facebook made your list of friends, pages you are a fan of, gender, geographic region and networks publicly available to everyone? Now, the social networking behemoth has silently enabled facial recognition software without your permission under the rather benign tag "Suggest photos of me to friends." Even if you choose to disable the option, Facebook still will have the technical ability to connect your name with your image.
Mark Zuckerberg might say his company is just evolving on privacy – witness his comments in this video interview that:
"We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating and be updating what our system is to reflect what the current social norms are."
Contrast this with his former claims that privacy is "the vector around which Facebook operates".
Imagine if, in the name this vector, his company had labelled the new feature "facial recognition photo tags" and required users to opt in, rather than disable it after the fact. Methinks Zuckerberg would have had fewer takers.
But already, the deck is stacked against privacy. As media activist Cory Doctorow noted in a TED lecture, Facebook employs "very powerful game-like mechanisms to reward to disclosure – it embodies BF's Skinner's famous thought experiment, the notion of the Skinner box … lavish[ing] you with attention from the people that you love … in service to a business model that cashes in the precious material of our social lives." Is this new feature really designed to make the site more useful to users or to boost its commercial value as it nears an initial public stock offering?
As Joan Goodchild, senior editor of CSO (chief security officer) Online, noted to me:
"Many privacy advocates feel Facebook needs to do a better job of educating folks about what the new feature is, what it does, and how to opt in or out. Many also feel a user should always be opted out of new features automatically, and should then have to opt in themselves. But it is often the other way around when Facebook rolls out these features."
My concerns go deeper: once data is available to third parties, however temporarily, the cat is out of the bag and beyond retrieval. And it's not just this constant meddling with our settings that's releasing our information – there are also security holes, not to mention scams and release of our data by third-party apps, which the Wall Street Journal found "were sending Facebook ID numbers to at least 25 advertising and data firms, several of which build profiles of internet users by tracking their online activities". More recently, Facebook was adding apps to our profiles that we hadn't requested and which we were unable to permanently disable.
And these front doors – and also back doors – are available for governments, including our own, which has been surveilling such security "risks" as the Quakers and calling Virginia opponents of mountaintop removal "terrorists" (while excluding the Ku Klux Klan). There are already huge government-controlled facial databases: your photo on your driver's licence, government-issued identity card, travel visa and passport ends up in a government office. If the government wants to see a photo of your face, it often wouldn't need Facebook to get it. But Facebook's facial recognition feature certainly adds data points and a social graph. As Bruce Schneier, chief security technology officer of BT wrote me:
"Right now, Facebook has the largest collection of identified photos outside of governments. I don't think we know what the ramifications of that will be."
All this reminds me of Steven Spielberg's Minority Report: the 2002 film, based on a 1958 short story by Philip K Dick, featured law enforcement preventing "precrimes" and corporations bombarding passersby with holographic advertisements which crawled up the sides of walls, addressing them by name.
Goodchild recently listed some of the hidden dangers of Facebook. And this is nothing new. As early as 2005 (the year after Facebook's rollout), MIT students were already detailing what they saw as Facebook's threats to privacy:
"Users disclose too much, Facebook does not take adequate steps to protect user privacy, and third parties are actively seeking out end-user information using Facebook."
Facial recognition on Facebook arrived with no notice in the US, unless you kept up with the social network's blog last December. The feature came to general light last week, when Facebook extended the feature to other countries and European regulators started investigating.
In the US, Congressman Edward Markey (Democrat, Massachusetts), co-chairman of the bipartisan congressional privacy caucus, has complained:
"Requiring users to disable this feature after they've already been included by Facebook is no substitute for an opt-in process … If this new feature is as useful as Facebook claims, it should be able to stand on its own, without an automatic sign-up that changes users' privacy settings without their permission."
[......]
--------------------------------------------------
Personally I look forward to seeing how the recognition of a swamp benefits the third parties .....
The swamp is my world. It is who I am. It is what I am. I was once a man. I know the evil men do. Do not bring your evil here, I warn you. Beware the wrath of... Swamp Thing!"
© WonderCafe. All Rights Reserved
Brought to you by the people of The United Church of Canada
Opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WonderCafe or The United Church of Canada
Comments
Elanorgold
Posted on: 06/19/2011 23:53
Thanks for posting this LB. Darn glad I'm out of that monster. It's bloomin' 1984! Good plan being a swamp thing.
revjohn
Posted on: 06/20/2011 17:44
Hi LBmuskoka,
I googled myself and ran the images option to see what would pop up. The first few hits were me or my avatar from facebook and here.
There was quite a few hits on pictures of food.
Facial recognition and recognition of stuff I fill my face with.
Creepy.
Grace and peace to you.
John
LBmuskoka
Posted on: 06/21/2011 05:59
RevJohn,
Thank you for the new Google game. I did the same and found a picture of a sexy young woman in black leather politely hoping others have a nice day - at least one part of my personality was truly recognizable
My Facebook avatar was there as well, not nearly as sexy but prettier I think - but then I am partial to my swamp.
LB - pondering the possibility of a Spielburgesque moment of holographic images and a deep voice saying "Hey there Wild Thing, check out the sales at the Leather Emporium and don't forget to renew your subscription for Ducks Unlimited (TM)....
LBmuskoka
Posted on: 07/27/2011 07:33
An update....
Facebook facial-recognition feature won't be available to Canadians
chemgal
Posted on: 07/27/2011 09:44
I heard about the article, and I'm confused. I first had access to facial recognition for tagging my photos that I noticed last fall. Are they removing the ability for Canadians to do this? Maybe I just had a beta version? I don't post photos very often, maybe I only had the ability for a few weeks.
RevMatt
Posted on: 07/27/2011 09:50
Thank you, Jennifer Stoddard.
The_Omnissiah
Posted on: 07/27/2011 17:04
Yuck, facial recognition. It's bad enough that facebook is so open, now this?
As-salaamu alaikum
-Omni
Mendalla
Posted on: 07/29/2011 11:01
Windows Live Essential has a limited for of it built into their Photo application. Doesn't know who the faces are, but points out where there are faces in the picture so you can tag them if you like. Mostly works, though in one picture from my wife's last trip it only found 2 out of 5 faces. I don't actually use it to upload images to Windows Live yet so don't actually bother to do any tagging. I just find that the Windows Live Essentials photo app is better for downloading and fixing up images from my camera than the camera download function that comes with Win7.
Mendalla