Darrel Tessier's picture

Darrel Tessier

image

What is NOT the Gospel?

When I first became a Christian ("accepting Jesus as my Savior!") I read the Bible with a group of fundamentalists who interpreted the scripture in a "face-value" kind of way similar to what one hears on some posts and by TV evangelists and from many pulpits too. But over time, it ended up, even these people who all "took the Bible literally" argued with each other! They even went so far as to say of other fundamentalists that they were "of the devil" and preached a "false gospel!" For example, Baptists who believed "once saved, always saved" denounced the Pentecostals who said, "... but you can lose your salvation!"  It was a mess!

This simplistic way of interpretation ("... but the Bible says.... blah, blah, yadda, yadda....) can become idolatry. I heard some one call this "biblio-alitry!" When we ALL get to heaven will some be walking around with their noses stuck in their Bibles? "Wait a minute there God... I'm not sure what you’re saying to me here in front of you’re throne! Let me check that in the Good Book here and find a scripture about that! Ah, you see... but it says here...!” This putting God in a box, don't you think!?

Share this

Comments

seeler's picture

seeler

image

Answering the question  'what is NOT the Gospel?"

 

In my opinion anything and everything that gets in the way of the Good News that Jesus brought to a hurting world.  That God loves us and that God's kingdom is near at hand.   Anything that gets in the way of that message is NOT the Gospel.

 

Dcn. Jae's picture

Dcn. Jae

image

Darrel Tessier wrote:
For example, Baptists who believed "once saved, always saved" denounced the Pentecostals who said, "... but you can lose your salvation!"  It was a mess!

 

You're generalizing a bit much. Certainly not all Baptists even believe in eternal security. Even in my small little church of about 25 members, there is a wide scope of beliefs, all within the evangelical circle. I wouldn't say we denounce those who don't agree with us as you suggest. We just agree to disagree on minor non salvific issues.

GordW's picture

GordW

image

To be fair MC, he did not say all Baptists did that, but related that some he had seen did that (at least that is how I read it)

Dcn. Jae's picture

Dcn. Jae

image

GordW wrote:

To be fair MC, he did not say all Baptists did that, but related that some he had seen did that (at least that is how I read it)

 

Yes, that's true Gord. Fair enough.

musicsooths's picture

musicsooths

image

People are funny about church goers. I was at the store yesterday and we were talking about how we fight at home sometimes. Someone called me a hypocrite because I profess to be a Christian and still fight with my family sometimes. I said that even though I am religious it does not mean that I am perfect I am still human and I make mistakes.

Dcn. Jae's picture

Dcn. Jae

image

musicsooths wrote:

People are funny about church goers. I was at the store yesterday and we were talking about how we fight at home sometimes. Someone called me a hypocrite because I profess to be a Christian and still fight with my family sometimes. I said that even though I am religious it does not mean that I am perfect I am still human and I make mistakes.

 

Well said musicsooths. Don't we all.

 

seeler's picture

seeler

image

We talk, discuss, argue, and sometimes fight.  It doesn't mean that we don't love and respect and care for each other.   It means that we are trying to find out what matters to each of us, what we can agree on, where we will have to compromise, where one or the other will have to bend a little, and how to handle it if we cannot agree.  This is a healthy relationship.  What isn't healthy is when one insists that their way is the only way, or if they agree that one person will have all the authority and make all the decisions and the other will nod and agree.  "Of course, dear.  You are right, dear.  Silly me to think that I had an opinion."  

 

waterfall's picture

waterfall

image

 It's probably closer to say that we are in the box, not God.

blackbelt's picture

blackbelt

image

waterfall wrote:

 It's probably closer to say that we are in the box, not God.

i would say thats really close , really really close yes

unsafe's picture

unsafe

image

 

 

[quote=waterfall]

 It's probably closer to say that we are in the box, not God.

 

yesyesyes

 

GordW's picture

GordW

image

OR to say that we want to put God in teh box but God is not in the habit of obliging...

Dcn. Jae's picture

Dcn. Jae

image

Has anyone else here considered the feelings of the box itself?

Back to Religion and Faith topics