Do more? We couldn't do less. Canada has taken up obstructionism on this issue. If we simply decided to do nothing we'd be doing more than we're doing now.
qwerty
Posted on: 12/03/2011 17:15
Do more? We couldn't do less. Canada has taken up obstructionism on this issue. If we simply decided to do nothing we'd be doing more than we're doing now.
qwerty
Posted on: 12/15/2011 10:54
I'm interested how little attention this "Durban" thread attracted. I note that the other one in the cafe is also not receiving many posts. I makes me think that the government's level of concern for environmental issues reflects the engagement of Canadians generally. That does not bode well for our economic or environmental wellbeing in the future.
Comments
AaronMcGallegos
Posted on: 11/28/2011 13:49
Some background information:
As Durban conference opens, little hope for a climate-change agreement
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/as-durban-conference-opens-little-hope-for-a-climate-change-agreement/article2251354/
Feds announce funding to cut emissions but continue to oppose Kyoto
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1093518--feds-announce-funding-to-cut-emissions-but-continue-to-oppose-kyoto
qwerty
Posted on: 12/03/2011 17:14
Do more? We couldn't do less. Canada has taken up obstructionism on this issue. If we simply decided to do nothing we'd be doing more than we're doing now.
qwerty
Posted on: 12/03/2011 17:15
Do more? We couldn't do less. Canada has taken up obstructionism on this issue. If we simply decided to do nothing we'd be doing more than we're doing now.
qwerty
Posted on: 12/15/2011 10:54
I'm interested how little attention this "Durban" thread attracted. I note that the other one in the cafe is also not receiving many posts. I makes me think that the government's level of concern for environmental issues reflects the engagement of Canadians generally. That does not bode well for our economic or environmental wellbeing in the future.